Fisher v. The Anderson Behel Steven Creek Porche Audi Employee Benefit Plan et al

Filing 95

STIPULATION AND ORDER 94 Re: Satisfaction of Judgment and Request for Dismissal. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 12/24/08. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/24/2008)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

John M. LeBlanc (155842), [e-mail] Andrew S. Williams (177926), [e-mail] Justin J. Lowe (223847), [e-mail] BARGER & WOLEN LLP 633 West Fifth Street, 47th Floor Los Angeles, California 90071 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone]

*E-FILED - 12/24/08*
Attorneys for Real Party in Interest CALIFORNIA PHYSICIANS' SERVICE DBA BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GINA FISHER,

) ) Petitioners, ) ) vs. ) ) THE ANDERSON BEHEL STEVEN CREEK ) PORCHE AUDI EMPLOYEE BENEFIT ) PLAN, ) ) Defendant. ) ) ) ) BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA, ) ) Real Parties in Interest. ) ) ) ) )

CASE NO.: C 05 3790 RMW Hon. Ronald M. Whyte STIPULATION RE SATISFACTION OF JUDGMENT AND REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO RULE 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) OF THE FEDERAL RULES XXXXXXX OF CIVIL PROCEDURE; [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON

i:\office5\5667\336\08pleadings\stipulation and order re dismissal.doc
BARGER & WOLEN LLP
633 W. FIFTH ST. FORTY-SEVENTH FLOOR LOS ANGELES, CA 90071 [phone]

STIPULATION AND REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL CASE NO. C 05 3790 RMW

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

It is hereby stipulated by and between Plaintiff Gina Fisher and Real Party in Interest California Physicians' Service dba Blue Shield of California ("Blue Shield") as follows: 1. On October 6, 2008, the Court issued its Judgment Remanding Case for Payment in

Accordance with Opinion on Review (Document 92), which required Blue Shield to process and pay certain medical claims by Plaintiff as specified in the Court's October 6, 2008 Order (Document 91). 2. Blue Shield processed the claims specified in the Court's October 6, 2008 Order and,

on November 20, 2008, forwarded payment of those claims, along with documents explaining the calculation of the payment, to counsel for the Plaintiff. 3. There are no further issues to be determined by the Court in this action, and the

Court need not continue to retain jurisdiction over this case. 4. The parties wish the case to be dismissed and, therefore, request the case be

dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Dated: December 18, 2008 BARGER & WOLEN LLP

By: /s/ Andrew S. Williams JOHN M. LE BLANC ANDREW S. WILLIAMS JUSTIN J. LOWE Attorneys for Real Parties in Interest California Physicians' Service dba Blue Shield of California Dated: December 18, 2008 LAW OFFICES OF LAURENCE F. PADWAY

By: /s/ Laurence F. Padway LAURENCE F. PADWAY Attorneys for Plaintiff Gina Fisher

-2BARGER & WOLEN LLP
633 W. FIFTH ST. FORTY-SEVENTH FLOOR LOS ANGELES, CA 90071 [phone]

STIPULATION AND REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL CASE NO. C 05 3790 RMW

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

ORDER Having read and considered the foregoing stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefor, the Court hereby orders this action dismissed with prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED.

12/24/08 Dated: ________________________

The Honorable Ronald M Whyte United States District Court Judge

-3BARGER & WOLEN LLP
633 W. FIFTH ST. FORTY-SEVENTH FLOOR LOS ANGELES, CA 90071 [phone]

STIPULATION AND REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL CASE NO. C 05 3790 RMW