Gaeta v. Perrigo Pharmaceuticals Company et al

Filing 396

ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Case Management Statement due by 12/2/2011. Case Management Conference set for 12/12/2011 10:00 AM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge James Ware on 10/25/11. (sis, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/25/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 9 Margarita Gaeta, et al., 10 NO. C 05-04115 JW Plaintiffs, ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 11 Perrigo Pharmaceuticals Company, For the Northern District of California United States District Court v. 12 Defendant. 13 / 14 15 This case is scheduled for a Case Management Conference on October 31, 2011. On 16 October 21, 2011, the parties filed a Joint Case Management Conference Statement indicating that 17 Defendant has filed a petition for writ of certiorari with the Supreme Court which “is currently set 18 for conference on October 28, 2011.”1 Defendant contends that it “anticipates its petition will be 19 granted,” in light of the Supreme Court’s “recent decision of the issues at play in this case” in two 20 other cases, and contends that the Court should vacate the October 31 Conference and stay any 21 further action until the Supreme Court issues its determination on Defendant’s petition. (Id.) 22 Plaintiffs contend that because there is “no way to determine the amount of time [the Supreme 23 Court] will take to determine whether it will accept the case,” the Court should “set this matter for 24 trial and then inform [the Supreme Court] of the schedule so [the Supreme Court] can either issue a 25 ruling within that time period, or stay the proceedings in this case.” (Id.) 26 27 28 1 (See Joint Case Management Conference Statement at 3, Docket Item No. 393.) 1 Based on the parties’ representations, the Court finds good cause to continue the Conference 2 pending the Supreme Court’s determination on Defendant’s petition for certiorari. Accordingly, the 3 Court CONTINUES the Case Management Conference to December 12, 2011 at 10 a.m. On or 4 before December 2, 2011, the parties shall submit a Joint Case Management Statement updating the 5 Court on the status of the Supreme Court proceedings and provide a good faith proposed schedule 6 on how this case should proceed. 7 8 9 Dated: October 25, 2011 JAMES WARE United States District Chief Judge 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 1 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT COPIES OF THIS ORDER HAVE BEEN DELIVERED TO: 2 Andrew Joseph Spielberger witzer@witzerlaw.com Bill Zook bzook@tedlyon.com Brian David Witzer witzer@witzerlaw.com Colin C. Munro cmunro@archernorris.com Colleen T. Davies cdavies@reedsmith.com David D Mesa david.mesa@sdma.com Genese Kay Dopson genese.dopson@sdma.com J. David Bickham dbickham@reedsmith.com James Conner Barber jcb888@aol.com Jennifer Brenda Bonneville jennifer.bonneville@sdma.com Joseph P. Thomas jthomas@ulmer.com Judith Belle Anderson janderson@archernorris.com Juliet W. Starrett jstarrett@reedsmith.com Kelly Savage Day kelly.savage@sdma.com Kenneth C. Ward kcward@archernorris.com Marquette William Wolf mwolf@tedlyon.com Meghan Kathleen Landrum mklandrum@reedsmith.com Michael F. Healy michael.healy@sdma.com Miranda Picken Neal miranda.neal@madera-county.com Prentiss Wilmer Hallenbeck phallenbeck@ulmer.com Randall Penner penner.bradley@sbcglobal.net Rebecca Marie Biernat Rebecca.Biernat@tuckerellis.com Rowena Javier Dizon rowena@witzerlaw.com Thomas Michael Frieder tmf@hassard.com 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 Dated: October 25, 2011 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk 16 By: 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 /s/ JW Chambers Susan Imbriani Courtroom Deputy

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?