Decker v. Tramiel et al

Filing 72

ORDER REQUESTING ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FROM THE TRUSTEE RE 62 PENDING MOTION FOR REVIEW OF TAXED COSTS. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 11/12/2010. (jflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/12/2010)

Download PDF
Decker v. Tramiel et al Doc. 72 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 action. C a s e No. C 05-4709 JF O R D E R REQUESTING ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FROM THE TRUSTEE RE PENDING MOTION ( JF L C 2 ) 1 **E-Filed 11/12/2010** IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION IN RE JTS CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, fka ATARI CORPORATION, Debtor. ________________________________________ MOHAMED POONJA, Trustee,1 Appellant-Plaintiff, v. JACK TRAMIEL, Appellee-Defendant. Case Number C 05-4709 JF ORDER REQUESTING ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FROM THE TRUSTEE RE PENDING MOTION FOR REVIEW OF TAXED COSTS On November 12, 2010, the Court heard argument with respect to Jack Tramiel's motion for review of taxed costs. In considering whether to exercise its discretion to grant costs incurred by Mr. Tramiel to maintain the letter of credit, the Court requires information from the Trustee as Mr. Poonja has replaced Suzanne Decker as the plaintiff and bankruptcy trustee in this Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 to the impact such an award would have on the estate and its creditors. Within fourteen days after the filing of this order, counsel for the Trustee shall file a brief addressing this issue. The matter thereafter will be submitted without further oral argument. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: 11/12/2010 __________________________________ JEREMY FOGEL United States District Judge 2 C ase No. C 05-4709 JF O R D E R REQUESTING ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FROM THE TRUSTEE RE PENDING MOTION ( JF L C 2 )

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?