Ho v. Ernst & Young LLP

Filing 236

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXCEED APPLICABLE PAGE LIMIT FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION BRIEFING (approving 233 ). Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 8/17/2010. (jflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/17/2010)

Ho v. Ernst & Young LLP

Doc. 236

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

MARK R. THIERMAN, (State Bar No. 72913) LEON GREENBERG, (State Bar No. 226253) THIERMAN LAW FIRM 7287 Lakeside Drive, Suite 101 Reno, NV 89511 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] H. TIM HOFFMAN, (State Bar No. 49141) ARTHUR W. LAZEAR, (State Bar No. 83603) ROSS L. LIBENSON, (State Bar No. 181912) HOFFMAN & LAZEAR 180 Grand Avenue, Suite 1550 Oakland, CA 94612 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] MAX FOLKENFLIK FOLKENFLIK & MCGERITY 1500 Broadway, 21St Floor New York, NY 10036 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Interim Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs CATHERINE A. CONWAY (SBN 98366) GREGORY W. KNOPP (SBN 237615) CHRISTOPHER PETERSEN (SBN 260631) AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP 2029 Century Park East, Suite 2400 Los Angeles, CA 90067-3012 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 310-229-1001 Attorneys for Defendant

**E-Filed 8/17/2010**

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DAVID HO, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated and on behalf of the general public and DOES #1-20, Plaintiffs, v. ERNST & YOUNG, LLP, Defendants.

Case No. C 05 04867 (JF) -----------------STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]ORDER TO EXCEED APPLICABLE PAGE LIMIT FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION BRIEFING Hon. Jeremy Fogel

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXCEED APPLICABLE PAGE LIMIT FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION BRIEFING Case No. C 05 04867-JF (HRL) (Consolidated for Class Certification Purposes with Case Nos. C-08-4988-JF and C-08-2853-JF)
Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

WHEREAS the parties have met and conferred and agreed to each exceed the applicable page limit for the class certification briefing in the Plaintiffs' moving brief and the Defendant's opposition brief by ten (10) pages. THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective undersigned counsel that: 1. Plaintiffs shall have up to thirty-five (35) pages for their Memorandum of Points and

Authorities In Support Of their Motion For Class Certification; 2. Defendant shall have up to thirty-five (35) pages for their Memorandum of Points and

Authorities In Opposition To The Motion For Class Certification.

Dated: August 16, 2010

_________/s/_______________ Ross L. Libenson HOFFMAN & LAZEAR Attorney for Plaintiffs ___________/s/_____________ GREGORY W. KNOPP (SBN237615) AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP Attorney for Defendant (This stipulation has been approved by Gregory W. Knopp) ORDER

Dated: August 16, 2010

IT IS SO ORDERED. August 17 Dated: __________________, 2010 __________________________________ United States District Judge

2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXCEED APPLICABLE PAGE LIMIT FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION BRIEFING Case No. C 05 04867-JF (HRL) (Consolidated for Class Certification Purposes with Case Nos. C-08-4988-JF and C-08-2853-JF)