Netscape Communications Corporation et al v. Federal Insurance Company et al

Filing 105

Compendium of Authorities in Support of Plaintiffs' 100 Reply on 85 Cross-Motion for Partial Summary Judgment filed by Netscape Communications Corporation, American Online, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1# 2 Exhibit 246# 4 7# 5 Exhibit 8911# 7 Exhibit 121417)(Related document(s) 100 ) (Abelson, Michael) (Filed on 3/2/2007) Modified on 3/15/2007 (cv, COURT STAFF).

Netscape Communications Corporation et al v. Federal Insurance Company et al

Doc. 105

Case 5:06-cv-00198-JW

Document 105

Filed 03/02/2007

Page 1 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

ABELSON | HERRON LLP Michael Bruce Abelson (State Bar No. 130739) Leslie A. Pereira (State Bar No. 180222) 333 South Grand Ave, Suite 1550 Los Angeles, California 90071-1559 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] [e-mail] [e-mail] BERGESON, LLP Daniel J. Bergeson (State Bar No. 105439) Marc G. Van Niekerk (State Bar No. 201329) 303 Almaden Boulevard, Suite 500 San Jose, California 95110-2712 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Plaintiff NETSCAPE COMMUNICATIONS CORP. and AMERICA ONLINE, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ­ SAN JOSE DIVISION NETSCAPE COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION, et al., Plaintiffs, v. FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., Defendants. PLAINTIFFS' COMPENDIUM OF AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS' REPLY ON CROSSMOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT Motion to be Heard Date: Time: Judge: Place: March 26, 2007 9:00 a.m. Hon. James Ware 8, 4th Floor, San Jose CASE NO. C-06-00198 JW (PVT) Case Filed: Assigned to: Courtroom: December 12, 2005 Hon. James Ware 8

USDC CASE NO. C-06-00198 JW (PVT)

PLAINTIFFS' COMPENDIUM OF AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS' REPLY ON CROSS-MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Dockets.Justia.com

Case 5:06-cv-00198-JW

Document 105

Filed 03/02/2007

Page 2 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

COMPENDIUM OF AUTHORITIES 1. Brentwood Investors v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9222 (N.D. Cal.), aff'd, 225 F.3d 661 (9th Cir. 2000) 2. Doskocil, Inc. v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co., 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9324 (N.D. Cal.) 3. Hartford Ins. Co. of the Midwest v. Wisk Computer Services, Inc., 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16260 (N.D. Cal.) 4. Hoffman v. Partners in Collections, Inc., 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12884 (N.D. Ill.) 5. Owens-Brockway Glass Container, Inc. v. Seaboard Surety Co., 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10337 (E.D. Cal.) 6. Royal Indemnity Group v. Travelers Indem. Co. of R.I., 2005 WL 2176896 (N.D. Cal.) 7. Semitool, Inc. v. Dynamic Micro Sys. Semiconductor, 2002 U.S. Dist. Lexis 23050 (N.D. Cal.) 8. ACS Systems, Inc. v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Ins. Co., 2007 Cal. App. LEXIS 113 9. Brenner v. Lawyers Title Ins. Co., 240 Va. 185 (Va. 1990) 10. Community TV Corp. v. Twin City Fire Ins. Co., 2002 WL 31677184 (Mass. Super. Ct.) 11. Concentric Network Corp. v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, 897 A. 2d 6 (Pa. Commonw. Ct. 2006) 12. Lerner v. General Ins. Co., 219 Va. 101 (1978) 13. London Guar. & Accident Co., Ltd v. White & Bros, Inc., 188 Va. 195 (1948) 14. Martin & Martin, Inc. v. Bradley Enterprises, Inc., 256 Va. 288 (1998) 15. Tamm v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co., 2003 Mass. Super. LEXIS 214 (Mass. Super. Ct.)
PLAINTIFFS' COMPENDIUM OF AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS' REPLY ON CROSS-MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

USDC CASE NO. C-06-00198 JW (PVT)

2

Case 5:06-cv-00198-JW

Document 105

Filed 03/02/2007

Page 3 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

16. The Anden Group v. Leesburg Joint Venture, 237 Va. 453 (1989) 17. Virginia Elec. & Power Co. v. Northbrook Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co., 252 Va. 265 (1996)

Dated: March 2, 2007

ABELSON | HERRON LLP Michael Bruce Abelson Leslie A. Pereira

By _____________/S/______________ Michael Bruce Abelson Attorneys for Plaintiffs Netscape Communications Corporation and America Online, Inc.

USDC CASE NO. C-06-00198 JW (PVT)

3

PLAINTIFFS' COMPENDIUM OF AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS' REPLY ON CROSS-MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT