Netscape Communications Corporation et al v. Federal Insurance Company et al

Filing 269

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 267 Extending Time for Parties to Submit Supplemental Privilege Log and Briefing Pursuant to August 25, 2010 Order. Signed by Judge Patricia V. Trumbull on 8/27/10. (pvtlc1) (Filed on 8/27/2010)

Download PDF
Netscape Communications Corporation et al v. Federal Insurance Company et al Doc. 269 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 ABELSON | HERRON LLP Michael Bruce Abelson (State Bar No. 130739) Vincent H. Herron (State Bar No. 72290) 333 South Grand Ave, Suite 650 Los Angeles, California 90071-1559 Telephone: (213) 402-1900 Facsimile: (213) 402-1901 Email: mabelson@abelsonherron.com vherron@abelsonherron.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs NETSCAPE COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION and AMERICA ONLINE, INC. SEDGWICK, DETERT, MORAN & ARNOLD LLP Bruce D. Celebrezze (State Bar No. 102181) Nicholas Heldt (State Bar No. 83601) One Market Plaza Steuart Tower, 8th Floor San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: (415) 781-7900 Facsimile: (415) 782-2635 Email: bruce.celebrezze.com nicholas.heldt.com Attorneys for Defendant ST. PAUL MERCURY INSURANCE COMPANY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION NETSCAPE COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION, et al., Plaintiffs, v. FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., Defendants. CASE NO. C-06-00198 JW (PVT) ORDER AND JOINT STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR PARTIES TO SUBMIT SUPPLEMENTAL PRIVILEGE LOG AND BRIEFING PURSUANT TO AUGUST 25, 2010 ORDER No Hearing Required . 28 CASE NO. C-06-00198 JW (PVT) ORDER AND JOINT STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO ORDER ON MOTION TO COMPEL Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THIS COURT, Plaintiffs Netscape Communications Corporation and America Online, Inc. (collectively, "Plaintiffs") and Defendant St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company ("St. Paul") jointly stipulate and agree as follows: WHEREAS, pursuant to this Court's Order of August 25, 2010 on Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel (the "Order") (Dkt. # 265), Defendant St. Paul must submit a supplemental privilege log and, if necessary, supplemental briefing by September 2, 2010; and WHEREAS, pursuant to this Court's Order, Plaintiffs must submit any responsive briefing by September 8, 2010; and WHEREAS, the parties agree that, due to Labor Day holiday and scheduling conflicts, there is good cause to extend the time for the parties to submit the documents requested by this Court's Order; and THEREFORE, AND SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THIS COURT, IT IS HEREWITH STIPULATED AND AGREED BY COUNSEL FOR THE PARTIES AS FOLLOWS: 1. Defendant's revised privilege log and, if necessary, supplemental briefing, currently due on September 2, 2010 shall be due on September 7, 2010; 2. Plaintiffs' responsive brief, currently due on September 8, 2010, shall be due on September 13, 2010. IT IS SO STIPULATED. Dated: August 26, 2010 ABELSON | HERRON, LLP Michael Bruce Abelson Vincent H. Herron Leslie A. Pereira By /s/ Michael Bruce Abelson Michael Bruce Abelson Attorneys for Plaintiffs Netscape Communications Corporation and America Online, Inc. CASE NO. C-06-00198 JW (PVT) 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER AND JOINT STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO ORDER ON MOTION TO COMPEL 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: August 26, 2010 SEDGWICK, DETERT, MORAN & ARNOLD LLP By /s/ Bruce D. Celebrezze . Bruce D. Celebrezze Attorneys for Defendant St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company ORDER IT IS SO ORDERED this 27 day of _________ 2010. August ___________________________________________________ PATRICIA V. TRUMBULL United States Magistrate Judge CASE NO. C-06-00198 JW (PVT) TRAV/1036622/7522290v.1 TRAV/1036622/7522290v.1 3 ORDER AND JOINT STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO ORDER ON MOTION TO COMPEL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?