Kinderstart.Com, LLC v. Google, Inc.

Filing 41

Kinderstart.Com, LLC v. Google, Inc.

Doc. 41

Case 5:06-cv-02057-JF

Document 41

Filed 07/12/2006

Page 1 of 2

GLOBAL LAW GROUP
2015 Pioneer Court, Suite P-1 San Mateo, California 94403
Gregory J. Yu Admitted in California and New York [phone] Fax [phone] E--mail: [e-mail]

July 12, 2006 Our Ref. No.: 4,022.01 VIA E-FILING // VIA E-MAIL ([e-mail]) The Honorable Jeremy Fogel United States District Court 280 S. First St., Courtroom 3, 5th Floor San Jose, CA 95113 Re: KinderStart.com LLC, et al. v. Google, Inc., C 06-02057 JF

Dear Judge Fogel: Plaintiffs hereby notify the Court and Defendants of a requested correction to "TRANSCRIPT of Proceedings held on 6/30/2006 before Judge Jeremy Fogel", filed on 07/06/2006, as Document No. 40 in the Court's Docket for this case. Page 18, line 14: The second word on this line should have been transcribed as "farm" instead of "forum". Plaintiffs' Counsel advised Defendant's Counsel of this transcription error via electronic mail on 07/11/2006. Thank you for your consideration of this matter. Respectfully submitted, /s/ Gregory J. Yu Gregory J. Yu, Esq. Attorney for Plaintiffs att. (Transcript of 06/20/2006 hearing, p. 18 only) cc: Peter Torreano, CSR, CRR ­ via e-mail ([e-mail])

C 06-2057_PLN_Transcript.l01

Dockets.Justia.com

Case 5:06-cv-02057-JF

Document 41

Filed 07/12/2006

Page 2 of 2
18

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25

a search engine. And, as we've explained in the briefs, Congress, Congressional intent, of course, was there to protect the players in the Internet, but I've looked at the distinction and definition between "Internet information location tool" that was in the Communications Decency Act and then the "interactive computer service." So even those cases including the Howard case, it closely latched onto AOL and said AOL, we basically have an e-mail system and content. Google largely doesn't have native original content. It is in a colloquial term a massive It is collecting sites and pushing

link forum.

them out, and so this is where we see it as an information conduit. And, as I've said in the briefs, no court, and I believe the FCC has not spoken on this, this issue about what is an information location tool, is it is a common carrier or not, I presume and I recognize that there is immunity we've built in. But by providing immunity for a

specific category like the information location tool that doesn't mean that Congress has specifically said with intent that Internet