Rezner v. Bayerische Hypo-Und Vereinsbank AG et al

Filing 435

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS MOTION TO STAY ENFORCEMENT OF STIPULATED JUDGMENT re 419 MOTION to Stay Enforcement of the Stipulated Judgment. On or before September 3, 2009, Defendant shall post a bond in the above amount and a proposed Order for Stay in Execution of the Stipulated Judgment for the Courts approval. Signed by Judge James Ware on August 3, 2009. (jwlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/3/2009) Modified docket text on 8/3/2009 (ecg, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 John Rezner, v. Plaintiff, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION NO. C 06-02064 JW ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO STAY ENFORCEMENT OF STIPULATED JUDGMENT United United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Bayerische Hypo-Und Vereinsbank AG, et al., Defendants. / Presently before the Court is Defendant HVB's Motion to Stay Enforcement of Stipulated Judgment. (Docket Item No. 419.) Defendant moves to stay enforcement of the parties' Stipulated Judgment pending its appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Defendant seeks a stay without posting a supersedeas bond or, alternatively, by issuing to Plaintiff a standby letter of credit. Plaintiff opposes staying execution of the judgment absent posting a bond. (Docket Item No. 427.) Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 62(d), an appellant may obtain a stay from enforcement of a judgment "by posting a supersedeas bond acceptable to the court." See Matter of Combined Metals Reduction Co., 557 F.2d 179, 193 (9th Cir. 1977). "The purpose of a supersedeas bond is to preserve the status quo while protecting the non-appealing party's rights pending appeal." Poplar Grove Planting and Refining Co., Inc. v. Bache Halsey Stuart, Inc., 600 F.2d 1189, 1190-91 (5th Cir. 1979). The bond also serves to compensate the prevailing party "for delay in the entry of the final judgment." See N.L.R.B. v. Westphal, 859 F.2d 818, 819 (9th Cir. 1988). The district 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 court has discretion to stay execution of a judgment without security or with an alternate form of security. See Federal Prescription Serv., Inc. v. American Pharm. Ass'n, 636 F.2d 755, 761 (D.C. Cir. 1980); Telemeter v. Hamlin Int'l Co., 754 F.2d 1492, 1495 (9th Cir. 1985). However, ordinarily the bond is computed to include the whole amount of the judgment remaining unsatisfied. Poplar Grove, 600 F.2d at 1191. Upon review of the parties' positions, the Court finds it appropriate to stay execution of the judgment pending appeal, provided Defendant posts a supersedeas bond in the amount of $18,125,000.00, which is 125% of the value of the judgment. Accordingly, the Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Defendant's Motion to Stay Enforcement of Stipulated Judgment. The Court will order a stay once the Court approves a supersedeas bond posted by Defendant in the amount of $18,125,000.00. On or before September 3, 2009, Defendant shall post a bond in the above amount and a proposed Order for Stay in Execution of the Stipulated Judgment for the Court's approval. United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: August 3, 2009 JAMES WARE United States District Judge 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT COPIES OF THIS ORDER HAVE BEEN DELIVERED TO: Allen Ruby ruby@allenrubylaw.com Allyson Stacy Taketa ataketa@fulbright.com Christopher Casey John McNamara cmcnamara@kasowitz.com Jennifer Lee Jonak jenny@jonak.com Joseph Hanho Park jpark@fulbright.com Mark P. Ressler mressler@kasowitz.com Melissa Mac Pherson mmacpherson@fulbright.com Michelle Lee Landry mlandry@kasowitz.com Ronald R. Rossi rrossi@kasowitz.com Tarifa B Laddon tladdon@fulbright.com William M. Goodman wgoodman@kasowitz.com William M. Lukens wlukens@lukenslaw.com United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California Dated: August 3, 2009 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk By: /s/ JW Chambers Elizabeth Garcia Courtroom Deputy 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?