Baldwin et al v. Dangerfield et al

Filing 109

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 107 to Vacate Trial Date and Schedule Trial Setting Conference. Trial Setting Conference set for 9/19/2008 01:30 PM. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 9/8/08. (dlm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/8/2008)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Lee H. Rubin (SBN 141331) lrubin@mayerbrown.com Rena Chng (SBN 209665) rchng@mayerbrown.com Aengus H. Carr (SBN240953) acarr@mayerbrown.com Jason A. Wrubleski jwrubleski@mayerbrown.com Mayer Brown LLP Two Palo Alto Square, Suite 300 3000 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA 94306-2112 Telephone: (650) 331-2000 Facsimile: (650) 331-2060 Attorneys for Plaintiffs RITA BALDWIN; and J.C., by and through his Guardian Ad Litem, RITA BALDWIN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT SAN JOSE DIVISION RITA BALDWIN; and J.C., by and through his Guardian Ad Litem, RITA BALDWIN, Plaintiffs, v. CHARLES DANGERFIELD; JASON LARA; JOHN JEFFERSON; MIKE NELSEN; and DOES 1-25, inclusive, Defendants. Case No. CV-06-2467 JF (HRL) STIPULATED REQUEST TO VACATE TRIAL DATE AND SCHEDULE TRIAL SETTING CONFERENCE; [PRO----------- ORDER ------- POSED] STIPULATED REQUEST TO VACATE TRIAL DATE AND SCHEDULE TRIAL SETTING CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No. CV-06-2467 JF (HRL) 44049423.1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2008; 2008; Pursuant to Local Rule 6-2, Plaintiffs Rita Baldwin and J.C. and Defendants Charles Dangerfield, Jason Lara, John Jefferson, and Mike Nelsen, by and through their respective counsel of record, stipulate and agree as follows: WHEREAS, trial of the above-captioned matter is currently scheduled for October 24, WHEREAS, counsel for Plaintiffs has another trial scheduled to begin on October 20, WHEREAS, counsel for Plaintiffs proposed continuing trial for a few weeks to November 7 or 14, 2008; WHEREAS, Defendants are not available for a trial in November; and WHEREAS, the parties have met and conferred and hereby jointly request a trial setting conference on September 19, 2008, or as soon thereafter as is convenient for the Court; THEREFORE, it is hereby stipulated and agreed by Plaintiffs and Defendants, through their respective counsel of record, as follows: The trial date is vacated. A new trial date will be chosen during the trial setting conference on September 19, 2008, or as soon thereafter as is convenient for the Court. IT IS SO STIPULATED. Dated: September 4, 2008 Burton, Volkmann & Schmal, LLP By: /s/ Timothy J. Schmal_____ Timothy J. Schmal Attorneys for Defendant Mike Nelson, individually and in his capacity as a police officer for the City of Morgan Hill Dated: September 4, 2008 Deputy Attorney General Office Of The Attorney General State of California By: /s/ Troy B. Overton_______ Troy B. Overton Attorneys for Defendants Charles Dangerfield, Jason Lara and John Jefferson STIPULATED REQUEST TO VACATE TRIAL DATE AND SCHEDULE TRIAL SETTING CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No. CV-06-2647 JF 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: September 4, 2008 Mayer Brown LLP By: /s/ Lee H. Rubin_________ Lee H. Rubin Attorneys for Plaintiffs Rita Baldwin and J.C., by and through his Guardian Ad Litem, Rita Baldwin Filer's Attestation: Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B), Rena Chng hereby attests that the signatories' concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained. [PROPOSED] ORDER Pursuant to stipulation of the parties, the trial date is vacated. A new trial date will be chosen at the trial setting conference on ___9/_________, 2008. at 1:30 p.m. _ 19 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9/ _ 08 Date: _____8/______________ ___________________________________ Honorable Jeremy Fogel United States District Judge -2STIPULATED REQUEST TO VACATE TRIAL DATE AND SCHEDULE TRIAL SETTING CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No. CV-06-2467 JF (HRL)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?