Kremen v. American Registry For Internet Numbers Ltd.

Filing 33

ADR Clerks Notice re: Non-Compliance with Court Order. (tjs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/11/2006)

Download PDF
Kremen v. American Registry For Internet Numbers Ltd. Doc. 33 Case 5:06-cv-02554-JW Document 33 Filed 10/11/2006 Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Northern District of California UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Northern District of California Kremen, Plaintiff(s), v. American Registry For Internet Numbers Ltd., Defendant(s). 06-02554 JW NOTICE RE: NONCOMPLIANCE WITH COURT ORDER United States District Court 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The parties have failed to file an ADR Certification and either a Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Selecting an ADR Process or a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference as required by the Initial Case Management Scheduling Order. Counsel shall Meet and Confer forthwith in an attempt to agree on an ADR process for this matter. Thereafter, counsel, on behalf of themselves and each party, promptly shall file an ADR Certification and either 1) a Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Selecting ADR Process, or 2) a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference (Civil L.R. 16-8(b), ADR L. R. 3-5(b) Civil L.R. 16-8(c), ADR L. R. 3-5(c), (d)). (These forms are available at www.adr.cand.uscourts.gov.) Further, in accordance with ADR L.R. 3-5(e) counsel shall concurrently provide a copy of all documents filed pursuant to this notice directly to the ADR Unit either by fax Notice Re: Noncompliance With Court Order 06-02554 JW -1Dockets.Justia.com Case 5:06-cv-02554-JW Document 33 Filed 10/11/2006 Page 2 of 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Northern District of California (415-522-4112), hand delivery (ADR Program, USDC, Northern District of California, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, 16th Floor, San Francisco, California), or by PDF attachment to an e-mail directed to adr@cand.uscourts.gov. It is the responsibility of counsel to schedule an ADR Phone Conference, if required, to occur before the Case Management Conference. Dated: October 11, 2006 RICHARD W. WIEKING Clerk by: Timothy J. Smagacz United States District Court 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ADR Administrative Assistant 415-522-4205 Tim_Smagacz@cand.uscourts.gov Notice Re: Noncompliance With Court Order 06-02554 JW -2- Case 5:06-cv-02554-JW Document 33 Filed 10/11/2006 Page 3 of 4 PROOF OF SERVICE Case Name: Case Number: Kremen v. American Registry For Internet Numbers Ltd. 06-02554 JW I declare that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. I am over the age of eighteen (18) years and not a party to the action. My business address is: ADR Program United States District Court Norther District of California 450 Golden Gate Avenue Floor 16 San Francisco, CA 94102 On October 11, 2006, I served a true and correct copy of: Notice Re: Noncompliance With Court Order [X] electronically, I caused said documents to be transmitted using ECF as specified by General Order No. 45 to the following parties: Terri R Hanley Idell & Seitel, LLP 465 California Street Suite 300 San Francisco, CA 94104 email@terrihanley.com Karl Stephen Kronenberger Kronenberger Hanley, LLP 220 Montgomery Street Suite 1920 San Francisco, CA 94104 karl@kronenbergerlaw.com Christopher L. Wanger Manatt Phelps & Phillips LLP 1001 Page Mill Road Building 2 Palo Alto, CA 94304 cwanger@manatt.com Case 5:06-cv-02554-JW Document 33 Filed 10/11/2006 Page 4 of 4 Stephen M. Ryan Manatt Phelps & Phillips LLP One Metro Center 700 12th Street, N.W., Suite 1100 Washington, DC 20005 Jack S. Yeh Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP 11355 W. Olympic Blvd. Los Angeles, CA 90064 jyeh@manatt.com [ ] by Facsimile, I caused said documents to be transmitted to the following parties by fax machine: [ ] by U. S. Mail, I placed a true copy in a sealed envelope with postage fully prepaid in the United States Post Office Mail Box in San Francisco, California, addressed as follows: I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration was executed on October 11, 2006 in San Francisco, California. RICHARD W. WIEKING Clerk by: Timothy J. Smagacz ADR Administrative Assistant 415-522-4205 Tim_Smagacz@cand.uscourts.gov

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?