McCurdy v. Simpson

Filing 52

ORDER TO PROVIDE COURT WITH CURRENT ADDRESS. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 4/24/09. (dlm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/29/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 NOT FOR CITATION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA REX MCCURDY, Plaintiff, vs. GARY SIMPSON, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. C 06-02830 JF (PR) ORDER TO PROVIDE COURT WITH CURRENT ADDRESS Plaintiff filed the instant pro se civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. A copy of the Court's "Order Addressing Pending Motions" (Docket No. 50) was mailed to Plaintiff at his last known address, but the order was returned on March 31, 2009, as undeliverable because Plaintiff was no longer in custody. (See Docket No. 51.) Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b), a district court may sua sponte dismiss an action for failure to prosecute or to comply with a court order. See Link v. Wabash R.R., 370 U.S. 626, 633 (1962); McKeever v. Block, 932 F.2d 795, 797 (9th Cir. 1991). But such a dismissal should only be ordered when the failure to comply is unreasonable. See id. A district court should afford the litigant prior notice of its intention to dismiss. See Malone v. United States Postal Serv., 833 F.2d 128, 133 (9th Cir. 1987). Pursuant to Northern District Local Rule 3-11, a party proceeding pro se Order to Provide Court with Current Address P:\PRO-SE\SJ.JF\CR.06\McCurdy830_41(b)notice.wpd 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 whose address changes while an action is pending must promptly file and serve upon all opposing parties a notice of change of address specifying the new address. See L.R. 311(a). The Court may, without prejudice, dismiss a complaint or strike an answer when: (1) mail directed to the attorney or the pro se party by the court has been returned to the court as not deliverable, and (2) the court fails to receive within sixty days of this return a written communication from the attorney or pro se party indicating a current address. See L.R. 3-11(b). In light of the foregoing, Plaintiff shall inform the Court of his current address no later than thirty (30) days from the date of this Order. Failure to timely do so shall result in dismissal of this action without prejudice under Local Rule 3-11(b) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). IT IS SO ORDERED. 4/24/09 DATED: JEREMY FOGEL United States District Judge Order to Provide Court with Current Address P:\PRO-SE\SJ.JF\CR.06\McCurdy830_41(b)notice.wpd 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA REX A. MCCURDY, Plaintiff, v. GARY L. SIMPSON, et al., Defendants. / Case Number: CV06-02830 JF CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. , I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the That on 4/29/09 attached, by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office. Rex A. McCurdy 000035-6 Napa County Jail 1111 Third Street Napa, CA 94559 Dated: /s/ Richard W. Wieking, Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?