Rose v. Reggio

Filing 9

ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge James Ware on September 30, 2009. (jwlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/30/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Al Isreal Rose, v. Ken Reggio, Defendant. / Plaintiff, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION NO. C 06-02845 JW ORDER OF DISMISSAL United United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 On April 26, 2006, Plaintiff filed this Complaint. On May 17, 2006, the Court granted Plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis. However, pursuant to 28 U.S.C 1915(e)(2), the Court conducted a review of the Complaint and dismissed the Complaint with leave to amend. (See Docket Item No. 4.) The Court ordered Plaintiff to file an Amended Complaint within 30 days of the date of the Order. (Id.) To date, well over three years later, Plaintiff has not amended his Complaint or otherwise communicate with the Court. Mails sent to the address provided on the Complaint have been returned to the Court as "undeliverable." (See Docket Item Nos. 6, 8.) It appears that Plaintiff has abandoned this litigation. Accordingly, the Court dismisses this action without prejudice. The Clerk shall close this file. Dated: September 30, 2009 JAMES WARE United States District Judge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT COPIES OF THIS ORDER HAVE BEEN DELIVERED TO: Al Isreal Rose PO Box 330133 San Francisco, CA 94133 Dated: September 30, 2009 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk By: /s/ JW Chambers Elizabeth Garcia Courtroom Deputy United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?