In re Trident Microsystems, Inc. Derivative Litigation
Filing
183
STIPULATION AND ORDER REVISING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS' SECOND AMENDED CONSOLIDATED VERIFIED SHAREHOLDER COMPLAINT (approving 182 ). The Motion Hearing set for 11/5/2010 is RESET for 12/3/2010 at 9:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 5th Floor, San Jose. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 9/27/2010. (jflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/27/2010)
In re TRIDENT MICROSYSTEMS, INC. DERIVATIVE LITIGATION
Doc. 183
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Jeffrey S. Facter (State Bar No. 123817) Patrick D. Robbins (State Bar No. 152288) Just in S. Chang (State Bar No. 205925) Mikael A. Abye (State Bar No. 233458) SHEARMAN & STERLING LLP 525 Market Street, Suite 1500 San Francisco, CA 94105-2723 Telephone: (415) 616-1100 Facsimile: (415) 616-1199 Email: jfacter@shearman.co m probbins@shearman.com jchang@shearman.com mabye@shearman.com Attorneys for Defendant Frank C. Lin
**E-Filed 9/27/2010**
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION IN RE TRIDENT MICROSYSTEMS, INC. DERIVATIVE LITIGATION Case No.: C 06-3440-JF STIPULATION AND ----------------[PROPOSED] ORDER REVISING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS' SECOND AMENDED CONSOLIDATED VERIFIED SHAREHOLDER COMPLAINT
This Document Relates to: ALL ACTIONS
STIP TO RESET BRIEFING SCHED. FOR RESPONSE TO SAC
CASE NO.: C 06-3440-JF
290727
Dockets.Justia.com
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
WHEREAS, on July 1, 2010, plaintiffs filed a Second Amended Consolidated Verified Shareholder Complaint ("SAC"); WHEREAS, on September 1, 2010, defendant Frank Lin and nominal defendant Trident Microsystems, Inc. filed motions to dismiss the SAC according to a briefing schedule agreed to by stipulation among the parties and ordered by the Court on August 20, 2010; WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to engage in a mediation session with the Honorable Justice Howard B. Weiner (ret.) in an attempt to resolve the disputes at issue in this action; WHEREAS, the parties agree that an extension of the current briefing schedule concerning the motions to dismiss would be beneficial to their efforts to resolve their disputes and conserve judicial resources; THEREFORE, IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED AS FOLLOWS: 1. Plaint iffs' deadline to file their brief in opposition to the motions to dismiss
shall be extended to October 15, 2010; 3. Mr. Lin's and Trident Microsystem's deadline to file their reply briefs in
support of their motions to dismiss shall be extended to November 5, 2010; and 4. 2010 at 9:00 a.m. The hearing for the motion to dismiss the SAC shall be on December 3,
Dated: September 24, 2010
SHEARMAN & STERLING LLP By: /s/ Justin S. Chang
Attorneys for Defendant Frank C. Lin Dated: September 24, 2010 DLA PIPER LLP (US) By: /s/ Nate McKitterick
Attorneys for Nominal Defendant Trident Microsystems, Inc. STIP TO RESET BRIEFING SCHED. FOR RESPONSE TO SAC 1 CASE NO.: C 06-3440-JF
290727
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Dated: September 24, 2010
ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN & DOWD LLP By: /s/ Travis Downs
BARROWAY TOPAZ KESSLER MELTZER & CHECK, LLP By: /s/ Robin Winchester
Co-Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs
ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED, 9/27/2010 The Honorable Jeremy Fogel United States District Judge
Dated:
STIP TO RESET BRIEFING SCHED. FOR RESPONSE TO SAC
2
CASE NO.: C 06-3440-JF
290727
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45 I, Justin S. Chang, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this Stipulation and [Proposed] Order. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that Nate McKitterick, Travis Downs, and Robin Winchester have concurred in this filing.
DATED: September 24, 2010
By:
/s/ Just in S. Chang
STIP TO RESET BRIEFING SCHED. FOR RESPONSE TO SAC
3
CASE NO.: C 06-3440-JF
290727
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?