Aristocrat Technologies et al v. International Game Technology et al

Filing 514

ORDER RE: PENDING DISCOVERY MOTIONS 191 , 214 , AND 243 AND MOTION FOR SANCTIONS 242 . (rslc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/26/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA *E-Filed 5/26/09* United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ARISTOCRAT TECHNOLOGIES; AUSTRALIA PTY LIMITED; and ARISTOCRAT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Plaintiffs, v. INTERNATIONAL GAME TECHNOLOGY, INC.; and IGT, Defendants. _____________________________________\ Case No. 5:06 CV 3717 RMW ORDER RE: PENDING DISCOVERY MOTIONS AND MOTION FOR SANCTIONS THIS MATTER is before the Court on a letter from plaintiff's counsel filed May 5, 2009, and a related letter from defendants' counsel filed May 14, 2009. Both letters request the Court to rule on three pending discovery motions (docket entries [191], [214], and [243]) and a pending motion for sanctions (docket entry [242]). The parties have indicated, however, that there is a likelihood that at least some of their outstanding disputes could be resolved without the Court's intervention. The parties shall, therefore, meet and confer as to the disputes contained in these four motions. Once the meet-and-confer is complete, within 14 days of the filing of this order the parties shall file with the Court a joint status update indicating what issues remain to be resolved. The status update should also indicate which, if any, disputes have not yet been fully briefed, and (if applicable) provide a proposed briefing schedule for such disputes. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 5/26/09 RICHARD SEEBORG United States Magistrate Judge United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?