Aristocrat Technologies et al v. International Game Technology et al

Filing 910

ORDER by Judge Whyte finding as moot 897 Motion to Strike and vacating hearing. (rmwlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/3/2010)

Download PDF
Aristocrat Technologies et al v. International Game Technology et al Doc. 910 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DATED: 9/3/10 v. INTERNATIONAL GAME TECHNOLOGY and IGT, Defendants. On July 21, 2010, plaintiffs Aristocrat Technologies, Australia Pty Limited, and Aristocrat Technologies, Inc. (collectively "Aristocrat") served defendants International Game Technology and IGT (collectively "IGT") with their answer to IGT's first supplemental counterclaims. On August 6, 2010, IGT moved to strike the objections made in Aristocrat's answer. On August 16, 2010, Aristocrat filed an amended answer (that does not contain said objections) to IGT's first supplemental counterclaims pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(1). In light of Aristocrat's amended answer, the motion to strike is now moot. The court therefore denies IGT's motion to strike without prejudice and vacates the hearing on the motion to strike. ARISTOCRAT TECHNOLOGIES, AUSTRALIA PTY LIMITED and ARISTOCRAT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Plaintiffs, No. C-06-03717 RMW IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION E-FILED on 9/3/10 ORDER DENYING MOTION TO STRIKE AS MOOT [Re Docket No. 897] RONALD M. WHYTE United States District Judge ORDER DENYING MOTION TO STRIKE AS MOOT --No. C-06-03717 RMW CCL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?