Aristocrat Technologies et al v. International Game Technology et al

Filing 971

ORDER by Judge Whyte denying 942 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal (rmwlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/3/2011)

Aristocrat Technologies et al v. International Game Technology et al

Doc. 971

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Defendants. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' ADMINISTRATIVE REQUEST TO FILE UNDER SEAL EXHIBIT K TO THE DECLARATION OF ROBERT T. CRUZEN IN SUPPORT OF IGT'S MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE LATE-DISCLOSED WITNESSES--No. C-06-03717 RMW JLR

E-FILED on 03/03/2011

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

ARISTOCRAT TECHNOLOGIES, AUSTRALIA PTY LIMITED and ARISTOCRAT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Plaintiffs, v. INTERNATIONAL GAME TECHNOLOGY and IGT,

No. C-06-03717 RMW

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' ADMINISTRATIVE REQUEST TO FILE UNDER SEAL EXHIBIT K TO THE DECLARATION OF ROBERT T. CRUZEN IN SUPPORT OF IGT'S MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE LATE-DISCLOSED WITNESSES [Re Docket No. 942]

On December 23, 2010, IGT requested leave to file Exhibit K to the declaration of Robert T. Cruzen in support of IGT's motion in limine to exclude late-disclosed witnesses (Dkt. No. 941) under seal pursuant to Civil Local Rules 79-5 and 7-11. The declaration at issue was designated by Aristocrat as "highly confidential." Aristocrat has not filed a declaration establishing that the

Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5

designated information is sealable as required by Civil Local Rule 79-5(d): Within 7 days [after the submitting party has filed the motion to seal], the designating party must file with the Court and serve a declaration establishing that the designated information is sealable, and must lodge and serve a narrowly tailored proposed sealing order, or must withdraw the designation of confidentiality. If the designating party does not file its responsive declaration as required by this subsection, the document or proposed filing will be made part of the public record. Accordingly, IGT's request to file under seal is denied. Within four days from the date of

6 this order, IGT shall file an underacted version of the subject document in the public record. See 7 Civil Local Rule 79-5(e). 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California DATED: 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' ADMINISTRATIVE REQUEST TO FILE UNDER SEAL EXHIBIT K TO THE DECLARATION OF ROBERT T. CRUZEN IN SUPPORT OF IGT'S MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE LATE-DISCLOSED WITNESSES--No. C-06-03717 RMW JLR 2

03/03/2011 RONALD M. WHYTE United States District Judge