Shloss v. Sweeney et al

Filing 11

STIPULATION and (Proposed) Order to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint; Move Case Management Conference by Sean Sweeney, The Estate of James Joyce. (Nelson, Maria) (Filed on 9/29/2006)

Download PDF
Shloss v. Sweeney et al Doc. 11 Case 5:06-cv-03718-JW Document 11 Filed 09/29/2006 Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Lawrence Lessig Jennifer Stisa Granick (SBN 168423) David S. Olson (SBN 231675) STANFORD LAW SCHOOL CYBERLAW CLINIC CENTER FOR INTERNET AND SOCIETY 559 Natyhan Abbott Way Stanford, California 94305-8610 Telephone: (650) 724-0517 Facsimile: (650) 723-4426 Robert Spoo (admitted pro hac vice) DOERNER, SAUNDERS, DANIEL & ANDERSON, L.L.P. 320 South Boston Avenue, Suite 500 Tulsa, Oklahoma 74103-3725 Telephone: (918) 591-5328 Facsimile: (918) 591-5360 Attorneys for Plaintiff Maria K. Nelson (State Bar No. 155608) mknelson@jonesday.com JONES DAY 555 South Flower Street, Fiftieth Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071-2300 Telephone: (213) 489-3939 Facsimile: (213) 243-2539 Attorneys for Defendants SEAN SWEENEY, IN HIS CAPACITY AS TRUSTEE OF THE ESTATE OF JAMES JOYCE, AND THE ESTATE OF JAMES JOYCE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CAROL LOEB SHLOSS, Plaintiff, v. SEAN SWEENEY, in his capacity as trustee of the Estate of James Joyce, and THE ESTATE OF JAMES JOYCE, Defendants. LAI-2261450v1 jennifer@law.stanford.edu dolson@law.stanford.edu rspoo@dsda.com Case No. C 06 3718 JW HRL STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT; MOVE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Current CMC Date: Oct. 23, 2006 Requested CMC Date: Nov. 20, 2006 Joint Request to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint, Move CMC C 06 3718 JW HRL Dockets.Justia.com Case 5:06-cv-03718-JW Document 11 Filed 09/29/2006 Page 2 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WHEREAS, the Complaint in the above-captioned Civil Action was filed on June 12, 2006; WHEREAS, to date, the parties have sought and received three extensions of time for Defendants to respond to the Complaint, so that the time to respond currently is on or before September 29, 2006; and WHEREAS, the parties are engaged in settlement discussions. In order to continue such discussions and devote their resources to them, the parties agree, and respectfully request this Court to Order, a thirty day extension of the date by which the Defendants must answer, object or otherwise plead to the Complaint, up to and including October 30, 2006. The parties further request that the date of any event or deadline set by the Court in its Order Setting Initial Case Management Conference and ADR Deadlines, filed on June 12, 2006, be moved as outlined below. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between the parties, by and through their counsel of record, and the Court is respectfully requested to ORDER that the schedule be changed to the following: October 30, 2006: Last day for Defendants to answer, object or otherwise plead to the Complaint; 21 days before CMC: Last Day to Meet and Confer re: initial disclosures, early settlement, ADR process selection, and discovery plan; file ADR Certification signed by Parties and Counsel; and file either Stipulation to ADR Process or Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. 7 Days before CMC: Last day to complete initial disclosures or state objection in Rule 26(f) Report, file Case Management Statement, and file Rule 26(f) Report; LAI-2261450v1 -1- Joint Request to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint, Move CMC C 06 3718 JW HRL Case 5:06-cv-03718-JW Document 11 Filed 09/29/2006 Page 3 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 November 20, 2006, or as soon thereafter as is convenient for the Court: Initial Case Management Conference. Dated: September 29, 2006. JONES DAY By: /s/ Maria K. Nelson Attorney for Defendants SEAN SWEENEY, IN HIS CAPACITY AS TRUSTEE OF THE ESTATE OF JAMES JOYCE, AND THE ESTATE OF JAMES JOYCE Dated: September 29, 2006 STANFORD LAW SCHOOL CYBERLAW CLINIC CENTER FOR INTERNET AND SOCIETY By /s/ David S. Olson Attorneys for Plaintiff CAROL LOEB SHLOSS IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: . By Judge, United States District Court LAI-2261450v1 -2- Joint Request to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint, Move CMC C 06 3718 JW HRL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?