Shloss v. Sweeney et al

Filing 16

ADR Clerks Notice re: Non-Compliance with Court Order. (tjs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/2/2006)

Shloss v. Sweeney et al

Doc. 16

Case 5:06-cv-03718-JW

Document 16

Filed 11/02/2006

Page 1 of 5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Northern District of California Shloss, Plaintiff(s), v. Sweeney, Defendant(s). 06-03718 JW NOTICE RE: NONCOMPLIANCE WITH COURT ORDER

United States District Court

11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

The parties have failed to file an ADR Certification and either a Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Selecting an ADR Process or a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference as required by the Initial Case Management Scheduling Order. Counsel shall Meet and Confer forthwith in an attempt to agree on an ADR process for this matter. Thereafter, counsel, on behalf of themselves and each party, promptly shall file an ADR Certification and either 1) a Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Selecting ADR Process, or 2) a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference (Civil L.R. 16-8(b), ADR L. R. 3-5(b) Civil L.R. 16-8(c), ADR L. R. 3-5(c), (d)). (These forms are available at www.adr.cand.uscourts.gov.)

Further, in accordance with ADR L.R. 3-5(e) counsel shall concurrently provide a copy of all documents filed pursuant to this notice directly to the ADR Unit either by fax [phone]), hand delivery (ADR Program, USDC, Northern District of California, Notice Re: Noncompliance With Court Order 06-03718 JW -1Dockets.Justia.com

Case 5:06-cv-03718-JW

Document 16

Filed 11/02/2006

Page 2 of 5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Northern District of California

450 Golden Gate Avenue, 16th Floor, San Francisco, California), or by PDF attachment to an e-mail directed to [e-mail].

It is the responsibility of counsel to schedule an ADR Phone Conference, if required, to occur before the Case Management Conference.

Dated: November 2, 2006 RICHARD W. WIEKING Clerk by: Timothy J. Smagacz

United States District Court

11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Notice Re: Noncompliance With Court Order 06-03718 JW -2ADR Administrative Assistant 415-522-4205 [e-mail]

Case 5:06-cv-03718-JW

Document 16

Filed 11/02/2006

Page 3 of 5

PROOF OF SERVICE Case Name: Case Number: Shloss v. Sweeney 06-03718 JW

I declare that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. I am over the age of eighteen (18) years and not a party to the action. My business address is: ADR Program United States District Court Norther District of California 450 Golden Gate Avenue Floor 16 San Francisco, CA 94102 On November 2, 2006, I served a true and correct copy of: Notice Re: Noncompliance With Court Order [X] electronically, I caused said documents to be transmitted using ECF as specified by General Order No. 45 to the following parties: David S. Olson Stanford Law School Center for Internet and Society 559 Nathan Abbott Way Stanford, CA 94305-8610 [e-mail] Lawrence Lessig Center for Internet & Society Crown Quadrangle 559 Nathan Abbot Way Stanford, CA 94305-8610 Jennifer Stisa Granick Center for Internet & Society Stanford Law School Crown Quadrangle 559 Nathan Abbott Way Stanford, CA 94305-8610 [e-mail]

Case 5:06-cv-03718-JW

Document 16

Filed 11/02/2006

Page 4 of 5

Bernard A. Burk Howard, Rice, Nemerovski, Canady, Falk & Rabkin A Professional Corporation Three Embarcadero Center, 7th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111-4065 [e-mail] Anthony T. Falzone Stanford Law School 559 Nathan Abbott Way cyberlaw Clinic Center for Internet and Society Stanford, CA 94305-8610 [e-mail] Mark A. Lemley Keker & Van Nest, LLP 710 Sansome Street San Francisco, CA 94111-1704 [e-mail] Matthew Mickle Werdegar Keker & Van Nest, LLP 710 Sansome Street San Francisco, CA 94111 [e-mail] Dorothy Rebecca McLaughlin Keker & Van Nest LLP 710 Sansome Street San Francisco, CA 94111 [e-mail] Maria K. Nelson JONES DAY 555 South Flower Street, Fiftieth Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071 [e-mail]

Case 5:06-cv-03718-JW

Document 16

Filed 11/02/2006

Page 5 of 5

[ ] by Facsimile, I caused said documents to be transmitted to the following parties by fax machine: [ ] by U. S. Mail, I placed a true copy in a sealed envelope with postage fully prepaid in the United States Post Office Mail Box in San Francisco, California, addressed as follows:

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration was executed on November 2, 2006 in San Francisco, California. RICHARD W. WIEKING Clerk by: Timothy J. Smagacz ADR Administrative Assistant 415-522-4205 [e-mail]