Shloss v. Sweeney et al
STIPULATION and Proposed Order selecting Mediation by Carol Loeb Shloss (Olson, David) (Filed on 11/10/2006)
Shloss v. Sweeney et al
Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CAROL LOEB SHLOSS CASE NO. C 06 3718 JW HRL Plaintiff(s), v. SEAN SWEENEY, in his capacity as trustee of the Estate of James Joyce, and THE ESTATE OF JAMES JOYCE Defendant(s). _______________________________/ Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5: The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: Court Processes: Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4) Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) (Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR, must participate in an ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5) Private Process: Private ADR (please identify process and provider) ______________________ The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered.) other requested deadline: Dated:_11/9/06___ March 2007________________________________ ___/S/______________________ Attorney for Plaintiff CAROL LOEB SHLOSS __/S/_______________________ Attorney for Defendant THE ESTATE OF JAMES JOYCE STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
Page 2 of 2
[PROPOSED] ORDER Pursuant to the Stipulation above, the captioned matter is hereby referred to: Non-binding Arbitration Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) Mediation Private ADR Deadline for ADR session 90 days from the date of this order. Other ___________________ IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated:________________ ___________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?