Shloss v. Sweeney et al

Filing 49

STATEMENT OF RECENT DECISION pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-3.d Defendants' Statement of Recent Decision in Support of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative to Strike, Carol Loeb Shloss's Amended Complaint filed bySean Sweeney, The Estate of James Joyce. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit "A" to Defendants' Statement of Recent Decision)(Nelson, Maria) (Filed on 1/11/2007)

Download PDF

Shloss v. Sweeney et al Doc. 49 Case 5:06-cv-03718-JW Document 49 Filed 01/11/2007 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Maria K. Nelson (State Bar No. 155,608) mknelson@jonesday.com Anna E. Raimer (State Bar No. 234,794) aeraimer@jonesday.com JONES DAY 555 South Flower Street Fiftieth Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071-2300 Telephone: (213) 489-3939 Facsimile: (213) 243-2539 Attorneys for Defendants SE�N SWEENEY AND THE ESTATE OF JAMES JOYCE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CAROL LOEB SHLOSS, Plaintiff, v. SE�N SWEENEY, in his capacity as trustee of the Estate of James Joyce, and THE ESTATE OF JAMES JOYCE, Defendants. Case No. CV 06-3718 JW HRLx DEFENDANTS' STATEMENT OF RECENT DECISION IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE TO STRIKE, CAROL LOEB SHLOSS'S AMENDED COMPLAINT Date: Time: Judge: January 29, 2007 9:00 a.m. The Honorable James Ware LAI-2841731v1 Case No. C06-3718 JW HRL STATEMENT OF RECENT DECISION Dockets.Justia.com Case 5:06-cv-03718-JW Document 49 Filed 01/11/2007 Page 2 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Defendants Se�n Sweeney and the Estate of James Joyce (hereinafter "Defendants") respectfully submit, pursuant to Northern District of California Civil Local Rule 7-3(d), this Statement of Recent Decision in support of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative to Strike, Carol Loeb Shloss's Complaint. The Northern District of California has recently issued an Order granting a Motion to Dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction in a similar case. See Sandisk Corp. v. Audio MPEG, Inc., et al., No. C-06-02655 RMW (N.D. Cal. Jan. 3, 2007) (Exhibit A). Dated: January 11, 2007 Respectfully submitted, JONES DAY By: /s/ Maria K. Nelson Counsel for Defendants SE�N SWEENEY AND THE ESTATE OF JAMES JOYCE LAI-2841731v1 -2- Case No. C06-3718 JW HRL STATEMENT OF RECENT DECISION

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?