Shloss v. Sweeney et al

Filing 8

STIPULATION to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint by Sean Sweeney, The Estate of James Joyce. (Nelson, Maria) (Filed on 7/31/2006)

Shloss v. Sweeney et al

Doc. 8

Case 5:06-cv-03718-JW

Document 8

Filed 07/31/2006

Page 1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Lawrence Lessig Jennifer Stisa Granick (SBN 168423) [e-mail] David S. Olson (SBN 231675) [e-mail] STANFORD LAW SCHOOL CYBERLAW CLINIC CENTER FOR INTERNET AND SOCIETY 559 Natyhan Abbott Way Stanford, California 94305-8610 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Robert Spoo (admitted pro hac vice) [e-mail] DOERNER, SAUNDERS, DANIEL & ANDERSON, L.L.P. 320 South Boston Avenue, Suite 500 Tulsa, Oklahoma 74103-3725 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Plaintiff Maria K. Nelson (State Bar No. 155608) [e-mail] JONES DAY 555 South Flower Street, Fiftieth Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071-2300 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Defendants SEAN SWEENEY, IN HIS CAPACITY AS TRUSTEE OF THE ESTATE OF JAMES JOYCE, AND THE ESTATE OF JAMES JOYCE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CAROL LOEB SHLOSS, Plaintiff, v. SEAN SWEENEY, in his capacity as trustee of the Estate of James Joyce, and THE ESTATE OF JAMES JOYCE, Defendants. Case No. C 06 3718 JW HRL STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

LAI-2253187v1

Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint C 06 3718 JW HRL
Dockets.Justia.com

Case 5:06-cv-03718-JW

Document 8

Filed 07/31/2006

Page 2 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2006;

WHEREAS, the Complaint in the above-captioned Civil Action was filed on June 12,

WHEREAS on or about July 13, 2006, the parties filed a Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint, stipulating that Defendants' time to respond to the Complaint was initially extended up to and including July 31, 2006; WHEREAS the parties have agreed to a further extension of time for Defendants to answer, object or otherwise plead to the Complaint up to and including September 11, 2006, which date will not alter the date of any event or deadline set by the Court in its Order Setting Initial Case Management Conference and ADR Deadlines, filed on June 12, 2006; and WHEREAS the parties have agreed that Defendants will not contest service of process of the Complaint and accompanying documents initiating the lawsuit; IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between the parties, by and through their counsel of record, that Defendants' time to answer, object or otherwise plead to the Complaint in the abovecaptioned Civil Action shall be extended up to and including September 11, 2006. Dated: July 31, 2006. JONES DAY

By:

/s/ Maria K. Nelson

Attorney for Defendants SEAN SWEENEY, IN HIS CAPACITY AS TRUSTEE OF THE ESTATE OF JAMES JOYCE, AND THE ESTATE OF JAMES JOYCE Dated: July 31, 2006 STANFORD LAW SCHOOL CYBERLAW CLINIC CENTER FOR INTERNET AND SOCIETY

By

/s/ David S. Olson

Attorneys for Plaintiff CAROL LOEB SHLOSS
Stipulation C 06 3718 JW HRL

-2-