Shloss v. Sweeney et al
Filing
93
ORDER Vacating Hearing 87 Motion. The Court vacates the hearing set for 12/10/2007. The matter is submitted on the papers without oral argument. Signed by Judge James Ware on 12/5/2007. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/5/2007)
<![CDATA[
Shloss v. Sweeney et al
Doc. 93
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Carol Shloss, v. Plaintiff, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION NO. C 06-03718 JW ORDER VACATING HEARING
United United States District Court
11
For the Northern District of California
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Seán Sweeney, et al., Defendants. /
The Court finds Plaintiff's Motion for Judicial Clarification (docket item no. 87) appropriate for submission without oral argument. See Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). Accordingly, the Court VACATES the hearing presently scheduled for December 10, 2007.
Dated: December 5, 2007
JAMES WARE United States District Judge
Dockets.Justia.com
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT COPIES OF THIS ORDER HAVE BEEN DELIVERED TO: Anthony T. Falzone anthony.falzone@stanford.edu Bernard A. Burk bburk@howardrice.com David S. Olson dolson@law.stanford.edu Dorothy Rebecca McLaughlin dmclaughlin@kvn.com Jennifer Stisa Granick JENNIFER@LAW.STANFORD.EDU Maria K. Nelson mknelson@jonesday.com Mark A. Lemley mlemley@kvn.com Matthew Mickle Werdegar mmw@kvn.com Dated: December 5, 2007 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk By: /s/ JW Chambers Elizabeth Garcia Courtroom Deputy
United States District Court
11
For the Northern District of California
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
