IO Group, Inc. v. Veoh Networks, Inc.

Filing 9

STIPULATION and (PROPOSED) ORDER for Extension of Time for Defendant Veoh Networks, Inc. to Respond to Plaintiff's Motion to Consolidate re 5 by Veoh Networks, Inc.. (Morehous, Dean) (Filed on 9/13/2006) Text modified on 9/14/2006 to conform to document post by counsel(bw, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
IO Group, Inc. v. Veoh Networks, Inc. Doc. 9 Case 5:06-cv-03926-HRL Document 9 Filed 09/13/2006 Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 THELEN REID & PRIEST LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW Dean A. Morehous (CA Bar No. 111841) dam@thelenreid.com THELEN REID & PRIEST LLP 101 Second Street Suite 1800 San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: (415) 371-1200 Facsimile: (415) 371-1211 Michael S. Elkin (pro hac vice pending) melkin@thelenreid.com Paul M. Fakler (pro hac vice pending) pfakler@thelenreid.com THELEN REID & PRIEST LLP 875 Third Avenue New York, New York 10022 Telephone: (212) 603-2000 Facsimile: (212) 603-2001 Attorneys for Defendant VEOH NETWORKS, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION IO GROUP, INC., a California Corporation Plaintiff, v. VEOH NETWORKS, Inc., a California Corporation, Defendant. Case No.: C06-3926 (HRL) STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT VEOH NETWORKS, INC. TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-2 and 7-2, Plaintiff IO Group, Inc. ("Plaintiff") and Defendant VEOH Networks, Inc. ("Defendant"), hereby stipulate that Defendant shall have an extension of time, until Monday, September 25, 2006, to file its Response to Plaintiff's Motion to Consolidate. This extension will have no effect on any of the other dates currently scheduled in this action. -1STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT VEOH NETWORKS, INC. TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE C-06-3926 (HRL) Dockets.Justia.com Case 5:06-cv-03926-HRL Document 9 Filed 09/13/2006 Page 2 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 THELEN REID & PRIEST LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW This brief extension of time was necessitated by the very recent retention of Thelen Reid & Priest by defendant and the subsequent substitution of counsel. One previous extension has been sought, stipulated to and ordered in this matter, extending defendant's time to answer plaintiff's complaint until Monday, September 25, 2006. SO STIPULATED. Dated: September 12, 2006 THELEN REID & PRIEST LLP /s/ Dean A. Morehous Dean A. Morehous Michael S. Elkin (pro hac vice pending) Paul M. Fakler (pro hac vice pending) Attorneys for Defendant VEOH NETWORKS, INC. Dated: September 12, 2006 THE LAW FIRM OF GILL SPERLEIN Gill Sperlein /s/ Gill Sperlein GILL SPERLEIN Attorneys for Plaintiff IO GROUP, INC. I, Dean A. Morehous, hereby attest, pursuant to N.D. Cal. General Order No. 45, that the concurrence to the filing of this document has been obtained from each signatory hereto. /s/ Dean A. Morehous Dean A. Morehous -2STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT VEOH NETWORKS, INC. TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE C-06-3926 (HRL) Case 5:06-cv-03926-HRL Document 9 Filed 09/13/2006 Page 3 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 THELEN REID & PRIEST LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW [PROPOSED] ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: ______________________ HONORABLE HOWARD R. LLOYD UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE -3STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT VEOH NETWORKS, INC. TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE C-06-3926 (HRL)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?