Watson et al v. County of Santa Clara et al

Filing 203

STIPULATION AND ORDER 202 Regarding Hearing on Motions for Summary Judgment by Defendants Singh, West, Mailhot, Hamilton, Noble, Kahle, Ritter & Kearns. Motion Hearing set for 9/11/2009 09:00 AM in Courtroom 6, 4th Floor, San Jose. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 7/16/09. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/16/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 A N N M IL L E R R A V E L C o u n ty C o u n s e l C o u n ty o f S a n ta C la r a S a n Jo s e , C a l i fo r n i a ANN MILLER RAVEL, County Counsel (S.B. #62139) DAVID M. ROLLO, Deputy County Counsel (S.B. #111998) MELISSA R. KINIYALOCTS, Deputy County Counsel (S.B. #215814) GREGORY J. SEBASTINELLI, Deputy County Counsel (S.B. #104884) OFFICE OF THE COUNTY COUNSEL 70 West Hedding, East Wing, 9th Floor San Jose, California 95110-1770 Telephone: (408) 299-5900 Facsimile: (408) 292-7240 Attorneys for Defendants COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, NORMA SPARKS, YAZMINA LETONA, SHARON BURGAN, LINDA CASTALDI, JEWELS RAMIREZ, VU TRAN, RIMA SINGH, AARON WEST, JOHN HAMILTON, ANITA NOBLE, JANET KAHLE, MARY RITTER, DAVID KEARNS, and ELISABETH MAILHOT, M.D. *E-FILED - 7/16/09* UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (San Jose Division) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA et al., ) ) Defendants. ) __________________________________) TRACY WATSON et al., No. C06-4029 RMW STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING HEARING ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT BY DEFENDANTS RIMA SINGH, AARON WEST, ELISABETH MAILHOT, JOHN HAMILTON, ANITA NOBLE, JANET KAHLE, MARY RITTER, AND DAVID KEARNS'S The parties in the above-captioned action submit the following stipulation and order regarding the hearing on motions for summary judgment by Defendants Rima Singh, Aaron West, Elisabeth Mailhot, John Hamilton, Anita Noble, Janet Kahle, Mary Ritter and David Kearns. Specifically, on June 11, 2009, the Court issued a Modified Scheduling Order that set the last date to hear a dispositive motion on August 14, 2009. County Defendants recently learned that the Court is unavailable on August 14, 2009, and that the next available hearing is on August 21, 2009. Due to the unavailability of counsel on August 21, 2009, the parties stipulate that County Defendants may set their motion for summary judgment for hearing on September 11, 2009. S t ip u la t io n and Order Regarding Hearing on County Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 1 C 0 6 -4 0 2 9 RMW 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 1 The parties further agree to the following briefing schedule: · Defendants Elisabeth Mailhot, John Hamilton, Anita Noble, Janet Kahle, Mary Ritter and David Kearns will file their motions for summary judgment on July 24, 2009. · Plaintiffs will file their oppositions to the motions for summary judgment by Defendants Rima Singh, Aaron West,1 Elisabeth Mailhot, John Hamilton, Anita Noble, Janet Kahle, Mary Ritter and David Kearns on August 7, 2009. · Defendants Rima Singh, Aaron West, Elisabeth Mailhot, John Hamilton, Anita Noble, Janet Kahle, Mary Ritter and David Kearns will file their reply to the oppositions to the motions for summary judgment on August 14, 2009. I hereby attest that I have on file all holograph signatures for any signatures indicated by a "conformed" signature (/S/) within this efiled document. Dated: July 2, 2009 ANN MILLER RAVEL County Counsel By: /S/ MELISSA R. KINIYALOCTS Deputy County Counsel Attorneys for County Defendants Dated: July 2, 2009 By: /S/ JACQUELYN K. WILSON Attorney for Evergreen School District Defendants 28 A N N M IL L E R R A V E L C o u n ty C o u n s e l C o u n ty o f S a n ta C la r a S a n Jo s e , C a l i fo r n i a Defendants Rima Singh and Aaron West filed their motions for summary judgment on March 24, 2009. S t ip u la t io n and Order Regarding Hearing on County Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 2 C 0 6 -4 0 2 9 RMW 1 2 Dated: July 2, 2009 By: /S/ SHANNON SMYTH-MENDOZA Attorney for City of San Jose Defendants 3 4 5 6 Attorney for Plaintiffs 7 8 9 ORDER 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 A N N M IL L E R R A V E L C o u n ty C o u n s e l C o u n ty o f S a n ta C la r a S a n Jo s e , C a l i fo r n i a Dated: July 2, 2009 By: /S/ PETER JOHNSON THE FOREGOING STIPULATION IS APPROVED AND IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated:__7_16_09________ _/ __/ __ _________________________________ HONORABLE RONALD M. WHYTE United States District Court Judge 193043.wpd S t ip u la t io n and Order Regarding Hearing on County Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 3 C 0 6 -4 0 2 9 RMW

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?