Watson et al v. County of Santa Clara et al

Filing 330

STIPULATION AND ORDER 313 to Extend Time by One Court Day for Filing Opposition to Defendant City of San Jose's Motion for Summary Judgement or, in the Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 11/16/09. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/16/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RICHARD DOYLE, City Attorney (#88625) NORA FRIMANN, Chief Trial Attorney (#93249) CLIFFORD GREENBERG, Senior Deputy City Attorney (#122612) SHANNON SMYTH-MENDOZA, Senior Deputy City Attorney (#188509) Office of the City Attorney 200 East Santa Clara Street San Jose, California 95113 Telephone: (408) 535-1900 Facsimile: (408) 998-3131 Email: cao.main@sanjoseca.gov *E-FILED - 11/16/09* Attorneys for Defendants CITY OF SAN JOSÉ, WILLIAM HOYT, and CRAIG BLANK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSÉ FACILITY TRACY WATSON, RENEE STALKER, OLIVIA STALKER, SHAFER WATSON, RILEY WATSON, Plaintiffs, v. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, et al.; Defendants. NO.: C06-4029 RMW STIPULATION AND [] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME BY ONE COURT DAY FOR FILING OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT CITY OF SAN JOSE'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND CITY DEFENDANTS' REPLY BRIEF Date: Time: Crtrm: Judge: December 4, 2009 2:00 p.m. 6 Hon. Ronald M. Whyte STIPULATION IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the parties, through their attorneys of record, that plaintiffs TRACY WATSON, RENEE STALKER, OLIVIA STALKER, SHAFER WATSON, RILEY WATSON shall have until Monday, November 16, 2009 (a one-court day extension from the current due date of November 13, 2009 as set forth in the Stipulation of Parties and Order Regarding Hearings on Motion filed herein on August 26, 2009, Document 250) to file their Opposition to Defendant CITY OF SAN JOSE, WILLIAM HOYT, and CRAIG STIPULATION. AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR FILING OPPOSITION AND REPLY C06-4029 RMW 1 603010 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 BLANK (City Defendants) Motion For Summary Judgment or, in the alternative, Partial Summary Judgment, and that the City Defendants shall have until Monday, November 23, 2009 (a one-court day extension from the November 20, 2009 due date) to file their reply brief. All counsel have provided Shannon Smyth-Mendoza authority to file the stipulation with their electronic signature at the time of this filing. IT IS SO STIPULATED. Dated: November 4, 2009 /s/ Peter Johnson Peter Johnson Attorney for Plaintiff /s/ Shannon Smyth-Mendoza Shannon Smyth-Mendoza Attorney for City of San Jose Defendants /s/ Melissa Kiniyalocts Melissa Kiniyalocts Attorney for County of Santa Clara Defendants /s/ Jacquelyn Wilson Jacquelyn Wilson Attorney for Evergreen School District Defendants Dated: November 5, 2009 Dated: November 5, 2009 Dated: November 5, 2009 DATED: November 5, 2009 RICHARD DOYLE, City Attorney By: __ /s/ Shannon Smyth-Mendoza __ SHANNON SMYTH-MENDOZA Senior Deputy City Attorney Attorneys for Defendants CITY OF SAN JOSÉ, WILLIAM HOYT, and CRAIG BLANK STIPULATION. AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR FILING OPPOSITION AND REPLY C06-4029 RMW 2 603010 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION. AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR FILING OPPOSITION AND REPLY C06-4029 RMW ORDER The foregoing stipulation is approved and it is So Ordered, 11/16/09 Dated: ______________ ______________________________ Hon. Ronald M. Whyte Judge of the United States District Court 3 603010

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?