Watson et al v. County of Santa Clara et al
Filing
489
ORDER 488 Continuing Case Management Conference. Case Management Conference set for 4/6/2012 10:30 AM. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 3/29/12. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/29/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
PETER JOHNSON CSB#165523
LAW OFFICE OF JOHNSON & JOHNSON
319 Railroad Ave., Ste. 201
Pittsburg, California 94565
T: (925) 432-7447 F: (925) 473.0512
E: jjlaw2@earthlink.net
ROBERT R. POWELL, ESQ. CSB# 159747
DENNIS R. INGOLS, ESQ.
CSB# 236458
BRETT O. TERRY, ESQ.
CSB# 270694
LAW OFFICES OF ROBERT R. POWELL
925 West Hedding Street
San Jose, California 95126
(408) 553-0200 Telephone
(408) 553-0203 Facsimile
E: rpowell@rrpassociates.com
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
Case No. C 06-4029 RMW
13
14
TRACY WATSON, et al.,
ORDER OF THE COURT RE:
CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE
Plaintiffs,
15
v.
16
Current Date: March 30, 2012
Re-Set Date: April 6, 2012
Time: 10:30 a.m.
Room: 6, 4th Floor
Judge: Ronald M. Whyte
COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, et al.,
17
Defendants.
18
19
20
The Court, having received, reviewed, and considered the stipulation of the parties,
21
hereby orders the following:
22
23
1.
24
25
The Case Management Conference currently scheduled to be heard on March 30, 2012,
at 10:30 a.m., shall be re-set to April 6, 2012 at the same time and location.
//
Order of the Court Re: Continue
Case Management Conference
Watson-Stalker v. Santa Clara County
Case No. C06-4029 RMW
1
1
2
2.
The Revised Joint Case Management Statement shall be filed no later than March 30,
2012.
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
Date: March
, 2012
_________________________________
HONORABLE RONALD M. WHYTE
United States District Court Judge
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Order of the Court Re: Continue
Case Management Conference
Watson-Stalker v. Santa Clara County
Case No. C06-4029 RMW
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?