In re APPLE COMPUTER, INC., DERIVATIVE LITIGATION

Filing 214

ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENT. Final Settlement Hearing set for 10/31/2008 11:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 5th Floor, San Jose. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 9/8/08. (jflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/8/2008)

Download PDF
Case 5:06-cv-04128-JF Document 206 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 1 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 MARK C. MOLUMPHY (State Bar No. 168009) COTCHETT, PITRE & McCARTHY **E-Filed 9/8/08** 840 Malcolm Road, Suite 200 Burlingame, California 94010 Telephone: (650) 697-6000 Facsimile: (650) 697-0577 E-Mail: mmolumphy@cpmlegal.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Derivatively on Behalf of APPLE INC. GEORGE A. RILEY (State Bar No. 118304) O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP Two Embarcadero Center 28th Floor San Francisco, California 94111-3828 Telephone: (415) 984-8700 Facsimile: (415) 984-8701 E-Mail: griley@omm.com Attorneys for Nominal Defendant APPLE INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION In re APPLE INC. DERIVATIVE LITIGATION This Documents Relates to: ALL ACTIONS. Master File No. C-06-04128-JF [PROPOSED] ------------------- ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENT [PROPOSED] ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENT C-06-04128-JF Case 5:06-cv-04128-JF Document 206 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 2 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENT WHEREAS, the Settling Parties have made application, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23.1, for an order preliminarily approving the settlement (the "Settlement") of this Federal Action, in accordance with the Stipulation of Agreement of Settlement dated as of August 29, 2008 (the "Stipulation"); WHEREAS, all capitalized terms contained herein shall have the same meanings as set forth in the Stipulation (in addition to those capitalized terms defined herein): NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The Court does hereby preliminarily approve, subject to further consideration at the Final Settlement Hearing described below, the Stipulation and the Settlement set forth therein. 2. A hearing (the "Final Settlement Hearing") shall be held before this Court on October 31 11 a ________________, 2008, at ____________.m. (at least fifty (50) days from the date of this Order) at the United States Courthouse, 280 South 1st Street, Courtroom 3, 5th Floor, San Jose, California to: to: (i) determine whether the Settlement should be approved as fair, reasonable and adequate; (ii) hear Plaintiffs' applications for an award of attorneys' fees and expenses; and (iii) rule upon any other matters that come before the Court. The Court may adjourn the Final Settlement Hearing or modify any of the dates set forth herein without further notice to Shareholders. 3. The Court approves, as to form and content, the Notice of Proposed Settlement of Shareholder Derivative Action and Hearing ("Notice") attached as Exhibit 2 to the Stipulation and the Summary Notice of Proposed Settlement of Derivative Action ("Summary Notice") attached as Exhibit 5 to the Stipulation. The Court finds that the content, distribution and publication of the Notice and Summary Notice, substantially in the manner and form set forth in this Order, constitute the best notice practicable under the circumstances to all persons entitled to such notice. These notices fully satisfy the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23.1, the requirements of due process, and any other applicable law. 4. The firms of Broadridge Investor Communication Services, Inc., Computershare Limited, and Georgeson Inc. are hereby appointed to supervise and administer the notice 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENT C-06-04128-JF Case 5:06-cv-04128-JF Document 206 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 3 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 procedure as more fully set forth below: (a) September 15 Not later than ______________, 2008 (five (5) business days from the date of this Order), Apple shall cause the proposed Notice to be provided to all Apple shareholders as of the date of this Order who can be identified with reasonable effort and in the same manner in which Apple provides notice of its annual meetings and proxy solicitations; (b) September 18 Not later than ______________, 2008 (ten (10) days from the date of this Order), Apple shall cause the Summary Notice to be published once in Investor's Business Daily; and (c) October 20 By _____________, 2008 (forty (40) days from the date of this Order), Apple's Counsel shall serve on Plaintiffs' Counsel and file with the Court proof, by affidavit or declaration, of such mailing and publishing. 5. Pending final determination of whether the Settlement should be approved, no Shareholder, either directly, representatively, or in any other capacity, shall commence or prosecute against any of the Released Parties, any action or proceeding in any court or tribunal asserting any of the Released Claims. 6. Any Shareholder may object to the Settlement if such Shareholder completes the October 14 following not later than _____________, 2008 (thirty-five (35) days from the date of this Order): (a) filing with the Clerk of the Court proof of ownership of Apple Common Stock, including the number of shares of Apple Common Stock held and the date of purchase, and providing a statement that indicates the nature of such objection, any legal support and/or evidence that such shareholder wishes to bring to the Court's attention or introduce in support of such objection, and any documentation in support of any objection; and (b) simultaneously serving copies of such proof, statement and documentation, together with copies of any other papers or briefs such shareholder files with the Court, in person or by mail, upon counsel listed below, provided that if service is made by mail, then service by electronic mail or facsimile also shall be made on counsel listed below, no later October 14 than _____________, 2008 (thirty-five (35) days from the date of this Order): Mark C. Molumphy COTCHETT, PITRE & McCARTHY 840 Malcolm Road, Suite 200 Burlingame, CA 94010 Telephone: (650) 697-6000 Facsimile: (650) 697-0577 E-Mail: mmolumphy@cpmlegal.com Attorneys for Federal Plaintiffs and derivatively on behalf of Apple Inc. 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENT C-06-04128-JF Case 5:06-cv-04128-JF Document 206 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 4 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 7. J. Gerard Stranch, IV BRANSTETTER STRANCH & JENNINGS, PLLC 227 Second Avenue, N. 4th Floor Nashville, TN 37201-1631 Telephone: (615) 254-8801 Facsimile: (615) 255-5419 E-Mail: gerards@branstetterlaw.com Attorneys for State Plaintiffs and derivatively on behalf of Apple Inc. George A. Riley O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP Two Embarcadero Center 28th Floor San Francisco, California 94111-3828 Telephone: (415) 984-8700 Facsimile: (415) 984-8701 E-Mail: griley@omm.com Attorneys for Nominal Defendant Apple Inc. Douglas R. Young FARELLA BRAUN & MARTEL LLP Russ Building 235 Montgomery Street, 17th floor San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 954-4400 Facsimile: (415) 954-4480 E-Mail: dyoung@fbm.com Attorneys for Defendants William V. Campbell, Timothy D. Cook, Millard S. Drexler, Steven P. Jobs, Ronald B. Johnson, Arthur D. Levinson, Mitchell Mandich, Peter Oppenheimer, Jonathan Rubinstein, Avadis Tevanian, Jr., and Jerome B. York Jerome C. Roth MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP 560 Mission Street, 27th Floor San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: (415) 512-4000 Facsimile: (415) 512-4077 E-Mail: Jerome.Roth@mto.com Attorneys for Defendant Fred D. Anderson Sarah A. Good HOWARD RICE NEMEROVSKI CANADY FALK & RABKIN P.C. Three Embarcadero Center, Seventh Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 434-1600 Facsimile: (415) 217-5910 E-Mail: sgood@howardrice.com Attorneys for Defendant Nancy Heinen Any Shareholder who does not make his, her or its objection or opposition in the manner set forth above shall be deemed to have waived any and all objections and opposition, and shall be forever foreclosed from making any objection to the fairness, reasonableness and 3 [PROPOSED] ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENT C-06-04128-JF Case 5:06-cv-04128-JF Document 206 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 5 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 adequacy of the Settlement. 8. Any Shareholder who timely files and serves a written objection in accordance with paragraph 6 above and intends to appear at the Final Settlement Hearing must effect service of a notice of intention to appear on counsel listed above (at the addresses set out above) and file October 23 such notice of intention to appear with the Court by no later than _____________, 2008 (fortyfive (45) days from the date of this Order). Filing and service may be effected on the Court and counsel by mail, provided that service by electronic mail or facsimile also is made on counsel October 23 listed above no later than _____________, 2008 (forty-five (45) days from the date of this Order). 9. Any Shareholder who does not timely file and serve a notice of intention to appear in accordance with this paragraph shall not be permitted to be heard at the Final Settlement Hearing, except upon a showing of good cause and excusable neglect. 10. All papers in support of the Settlement and the applications for Attorneys' Fees and Expenses and all papers responding to any Shareholder opposition or objection filed pursuant October 23 to paragraph 6 above shall be filed no later than ______________, 2008 (forty-five (45) days from the date of this Order). 11. If the Settlement receives final approval by the Court, the Court shall enter final judgment in the form submitted by the parties, or in any other form of order deemed appropriate by the Court. The Judgment shall be fully binding with respect to all parties in accordance with the terms of the Stipulation. 12. The Court adjudges that, if and when the Judgment is entered, the Released Claims shall be deemed to have, and by operation of the Judgment shall have, res judicata, collateral estoppel, and other preclusive effect in all pending and future lawsuits or other proceedings maintained by or on behalf of the Settling Parties, as well as their respective predecessors, successors, parents, subsidiaries, affiliates and agents (including, without limitation, any investment bankers, accountants, insurers, reinsurers or attorneys and any past, present or future officers, directors and employees of Apple, and their predecessors, successors, parents, subsidiaries, affiliates and agents). 13. All proceedings and all further activity regarding or directed toward the Federal 4 [PROPOSED] ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENT C-06-04128-JF Case 5:06-cv-04128-JF Document 206 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 6 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Action, including but not limited to all discovery activities, shall be stayed and suspended until further order of this Court, except as to such actions as may be necessary to implement the Settlement or this Order. 14. Neither the Settlement nor any of its terms (nor any agreement, negotiations, or order relating thereto), nor any payment or consideration provided for in the Stipulation, is or shall be construed as an admission by Defendants or Apple of any fault, wrongdoing, or liability whatsoever, nor as an admission by any of the Plaintiffs of any lack of merit of their claims against Defendants or Apple. Neither the Settlement nor any of its terms (nor any agreement, negotiations, or order relating thereto), nor any payment or consideration provided for therein, shall be deemed or offered or received in evidence in any judicial, administrative, regulatory, or other proceeding or utilized in any manner whatsoever, including as a presumption, concession, or admission of any fault, wrongdoing or liability whatsoever on the part of Defendants or Apple; provided, however, that the Settlement (or any agreement or order relating thereto) may be used, offered or received in evidence in any proceeding to approve, enforce or otherwise effectuate the Settlement (or any agreement or order relating thereto) or the Judgment, or in any proceeding in which the reasonableness, fairness, or good faith of the Settling Parties in participating in the Settlement (or any agreement or order relating thereto) is at issue, or to enforce or effectuate provisions of the Settlement as to the Settling Parties. 15. The Court may approve the Settlement, with such modifications as may be agreed to by the Settling Parties, if appropriate, without further notice to the Shareholders. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: 9/8/08 HONORABLE JEREMY FOGEL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 5 [PROPOSED] ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENT C-06-04128-JF

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?