IN RE:JUNIPER SECURITIES LITIGATION

Filing 179

STIPULATED DISCOVERY PLAN re 173 Proposed Order filed by New York City Pension Funds. Signed by Judge James Ware on 11/17/2008. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/20/2008)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 UNIT ED Barbara Hart (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) David C. Harrison (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) Jeanne D'Esposito LOWEY DANNENBERG COHEN & HART, P.C. One North Broadway, 5th Floor White Plains, New York 10601-1714 Telephone: 914-997-0500 Lead Counsel for the New York City Pension Funds Willem F. Jonckheer, State Bar No. 178748 SCHUBERT JONCKHEER KOLBE & KRALOWEC LLP Three Embarcadero Center, Suite 1650 San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: 415-788-4220 Local Counsel RN Peter A. Wald, State Bar No. 85705 F D I T I C 183174 Patrick E. Gibbs, StateSBar No. T O R David M. Friedman, State Bar No. 209214 Viviann C. Stapp, State Bar No. 233036 LATHAM & WATKINS LLP 505 Montgomery Street, Suite 2000 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: 415-391-0600 Counsel for Defendant Ernst & Young E UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION In re JUNIPER NETWORKS, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION No. C06-04327-JW STIPULATED DISCOVERY PLAN DATE: TIME: BEFORE: This Document Relates to: All Actions Hon. James Ware {1964 / STIP / 00092225.DOC V1} STIPULATED DISCOVERY PLAN -- CASE NOS. C06-04327 A C LI Counsel for Defendants Juniper Networks, Inc., Scott Kriens, Pradeep Sindhu, Marcel Gani, are Robert M. Calderoni, ge James W ud Kenneth Goldman, J William R. Hearst III, Stratton Sclavos, Vinod Khosla, Kenneth Levy, and William R. Stensrud FO R NIA Nina F. Locker, State Bar No. 123838 Steven Guggenheim, State Bar No. 201386 S DI 230009 Joni Ostler, State Bar No. STRICT TE GOODRICH &C WILSON SONSINI ROSATI TA Professional Corporation 650 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050 DERED Telephone: T IS SO OR 650-493-9300 RT U O S I NO RT H 1 Pursuant to the Order of Magistrate Patricia Trumbull dated October 22, 2008 and Local 2 Rule 16-10, the undersigned hereby submit this Stipulated Discovery Plan for the Court's 3 approval. 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 1. 20 Depositions of Fact Witnesses Plaintiff the New York City Funds will be allowed to notice 30 depositions of fact Dispositive motion cut-off Expert deposition deadline 60 days after exchange of rebuttal reports No later than 45 days after close of expert discovery Exchange of rebuttal expert reports 60 days after exchange of expert reports Exchange of expert reports February 1, 2010 ACTION Initial disclosures under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26 Last day to join additional parties DUE DATE November 17, 2008 January 30, 2009 Fact discovery cut-off December 1, 2009, subject to review 21 witnesses; the Juniper Defendants will be allowed to notice 20 depositions of fact witnesses; 22 and Ernst & Young LLP ("EY") will be allowed to notice 10 depositions of fact witnesses. 23 Any party's exercise of the right to cross-examine a witness noticed by another party will not 24 count toward its deposition limit. The foregoing limits on fact witness depositions are 25 exclusive of expert witness depositions. 26 Each party reserves the right to seek leave of the Court to take additional fact 27 depositions of fact witnesses. 28 STIPULATED DISCOVERY PLAN -- CASE NOS. C06-04327 {1964 / STIP / 00092225.DOC v1}1 1 2. 2 Interrogatories Plaintiff may serve a total of 275 interrogatories on the Juniper Defendants and 25 3 interrogatories on EY. The Juniper Defendants and EY may collectively serve up to 225 4 interrogatories on Plaintiff. 5 Each party reserves the right to seek leave of Court to propound additional 6 interrogatories. 7 8 9 10 DATED: November 3, 2008 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATED DISCOVERY PLAN -- CASE NOS. C06-04327 {1964 / STIP / 00092225.DOC v1}2 IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD. BARBARA J. HART DAVID C. HARRISON LOWEY DANNENBERG COHEN & HART, P.C. /s/ Barbara J. Hart One North Broadway, 5th Floor White Plains, NY 10601-2310 914-733-7228 (telephone) 914-997-0035 (facsimile) Lead Counsel for Lead Plaintiff WILLEM F. JONCKHEER SCHUBERT JONCKHEER KOLBE & KRALOWEC LLP /s/ Willem F. Jonckheer Three Embarcadero Center, Suite 1650 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: 415-788-4220 Local Counsel for Lead Plaintiff 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 NINA F. LOCKER STEVEN GUGGENHEIM JONI OSTLER WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI Professional Corporation /s/ 650 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050 Telephone: 650-493-9300 Counsel for Defendants Juniper Networks, Inc., Scott Kriens, Pradeep Sindhu, Marcel Gani, Robert M. Calderoni, Kenneth Goldman, William R. Hearst III, Stratton Sclavos, Vinod Khosla, Kenneth Levy, and William R. Stensrud PETER A. WALD PATRICK E. GIBBS DAVID M. FRIEDMAN VIVIANN C. STAPP LATHAM & WATKINS LLP /s/ 505 Montgomery Street, Suite 2000 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: 415-391-0600 Counsel for Defendant Ernst & Young LLP JONATHAN A. SHAPIRO WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP /s/ 1117 California Avenue Palo Alto, CA 94304 Telephone: 650-858-6000 Co-Counsel for Defendant Juniper Networks, Inc. ATTESTATION I, Willem F. Jonckheer, am the ECF user whose identification and password are being 27 used to file STIPULATED DISCOVERY PLAN. In compliance with General Order 45.X.B, I 28 hereby attest that all parties have concurred in this filing. STIPULATED DISCOVERY PLAN -- CASE NOS. C06-04327 {1964 / STIP / 00092225.DOC v1}3 1 Dated: November 3, 2008 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 By: /s/ Willem F. Jonckheer___ Willem F. Jonckheer PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. November 17, 2008 DATED: ____________________ ____________________________________ Hon. James Ware United States District Judge STIPULATED DISCOVERY PLAN -- CASE NOS. C06-04327 {1964 / STIP / 00092225.DOC v1}4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?