IN RE:JUNIPER SECURITIES LITIGATION

Filing 259

STIPULATION AND ORDER AS MODIFIED BY THE COURT Expanding Page Limits for Juniper Defendants' Opposition to Lead Plaintiff's Motion for Class Certification re 258 Stipulation. Opposition brief shall not exceed 30 pages; Reply brief shall not exceed 20 pages. Signed by Judge James Ware on 5/14/2009. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/14/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Nina F. Locker, State Bar No. 123838 Steven Guggenheim, State Bar No. 201386 Joni Ostler, State Bar No. 230009 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI Professional Corporation 650 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050 Telephone: (650) 493-9300 Facsimile: (650) 565-5100 Email: nlocker@wsgr.com Email: sguggenheim@wsgr.com Email: jostler@wsgr.com Counsel for Defendants Juniper Networks, Inc., Scott Kriens, Pradeep Sindhu, Marcel Gani, Robert M. Calderoni, Kenneth Goldman, William R. Hearst III, Stratton Sclavos, Vinod Khosla, Kenneth Levy and William R. Stensrud (the "Juniper Defendants") Jeffrey B. Rudman (Pro Hac Vice) WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP 60 State Street Boston, MA 02109 Telephone: (617) 526-6000 Facsimile: (617) 526-5000 Email: jeffrey.rudman@wilmerhale.com Jonathan A. Shapiro, Esq. (Pro Hac Vice) WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP 1117 California Avenue Palo Alto, CA 94304 Telephone: (650) 858-6000 Facsimile: (650) 858-6100 ISTRICT ES D C AT Email: jonathan.shapiro@wilmerhale.com T UNIT ED RT U O SAN JOSE DIVISION In re JUNIPER NETWORKS, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) F D IS T IC T O R CASE NO.: C06-04327-JW ER N This Document Relates To: All Actions STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXPANDING PAGE LIMITS FOR JUNIPER DEFENDANTS' OPPOSITION TO LEAD PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXPANDING PAGE LIMIT FOR OPP. TO MOT. FOR CLASS CERT. CASE NO. C06-04327-JW A C LI NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FO mes Wa Judge Ja re R NIA Co-Counsel for Defendant Juniper D Networks, Inc. RDERE S SO O IED IT I DIF AS MO UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NO S RT H 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WHEREAS, plaintiffs filed their motion for class certification on March 2, 2009; WHEREAS, pursuant to the Court's Order dated on March 26, 2009, defendants' opposition to plaintiff's motion for class certification to be filed on or before June 1, 2009; WHEREAS, Civil L.R. 7-3(a) provides for a twenty-five (25) page limit on defendants' opposition brief to plaintiffs' motion for class certification; WHEREAS, the Juniper Defendants (defined in the caption above) believe that the page limits provided by Civil L.R. 7-3(a) will not be sufficient to address critical issues raised by plaintiffs' motion for class certification; WHEREAS, the parties met and conferred, and plaintiffs agreed to the Juniper Defendants' request that they be allowed to file an opposition brief up to forty (40) pages; WHEREAS, the Juniper Defendants agree not to oppose a later request by Plaintiffs to expand the page limits for Plaintiffs' reply in support of their motion for class certification; THEREFORE, the parties hereby STIPULATE and AGREE, and request that the Court order as follows: 1. The Juniper Defendants' opposition to Plaintiffs' motion for class certification may be up to forty (40) pages in length, exclusive of caption page, the table of contents, the table of authorities, declarations and exhibits; and 2. If Plaintiffs request additional pages for their reply in support of their motion for class certification, the Juniper Defendants will not oppose that request. DATED: May 1, 2009 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI, P.C. NINA F. LOCKER STEVEN GUGGENHEIM JONI OSTLER s/ Joni Ostler Joni Ostler 650 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050 Telephone: 650/493-9300 650/493-6811 (fax) Counsel for the Juniper Defendants STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXPANDING PAGE LIMIT FOR OPP. TO MOT. FOR CLASS CERT. CASE NO. C06-04327-JW -1- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DATED: May 1, 2009 BARBARA J. HART DAVID C. HARRISON JEANNE D'ESPOSITO LOWEY DANNENBERG COHEN & HART, P.C. s/ Jeanne D'Esposito JEANNE D'ESPOSITO One North Broadway, 5th Floor White Plains, NY 10601-2310 914-733-7228 (telephone) 914-997-0035 (facsimile) Lead Counsel for Lead Plaintiff WILLEM F. JONCKHEER SCHUBERT & REED LLP Two Embarcadero Center, Suite 1050 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: 415-788-4220 Local Counsel for Lead Plaintiff DATED May 1, 2009 PETER A. WALD PATRICK E. GIBBS DAVID M. FRIEDMAN VIVANN C. STAPP LATHAM & WATKINS LLP s/ David M. Friedman DAVID M. FRIEDMAN 505 Montgomery Street, Suite 2000 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: 415-391-0600 Counsel for Defendant Ernst & Young LLP * * ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.AS MODIFIED: The Juniper Defendants are GRANTED a FIVE (5) page extension to their opposition brief. The DATED: brief shall not exceed 30 pages. opposition _________________________ THE HONORABLE JAMES WARE If needed, it is further ordered that Plaintiffs' UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE reply brief is also granted a FIVE (5) page extension. The reply brief should not exceed 20 pages. Dated: May 14, 2009 STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXPANDING PAGE LIMIT FOR OPP. TO MOT. FOR CLASS CERT. CASE NO. C06-04327-JW * _____________________________ United States District Judge -2- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ECF CERTIFICATION I, Joni Ostler, am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used to file this STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXPANDING PAGE LIMITS FOR JUNIPER DEFENDANTS' OPPOSITION TO LEAD PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION. In compliance with General Order 45.X.B, I hereby attest that Jeanne D'Esposito and David M. Friedman have concurred in this filing. Dated: May 1, 2009 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI Professional Corporation By: s/ Joni Ostler Joni Ostler STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXPANDING PAGE LIMIT FOR OPP. TO MOT. FOR CLASS CERT. CASE NO. C06-04327-JW -3-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?