Zamora v. United States of America

Filing 2

ORDER Denying re 1 Motion to Vacate/Set Aside/Correct Sentence (2255) filed by Pearl Zamora. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 9/30/09. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/30/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 In her motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2255 Pearl Zamora complains that her attorney did not explain procedures and consequences to her clearly, was not prepared and promised she could present her defense at sentencing. The record belies Zamora's claims. She signed a written plea agreement and participated in a thorough Rule 11 colloquy. There was a sentencing hearing at which she testified. She fails to explain how she was prejudiced. The motion is denied. Unfortunately, it appears that this motion got overlooked on the docket. Although there were two post-plea supervised release issues that came before the court, the § 2255 motion was apparently not noticed by anyone. Fortunately, no prejudice has resulted. DATED: September 30, 2009 _____________________________ RONALD M. WHYTE U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE U.S.A., Defendant. v. PEARL ZAMORA, Plaintiff, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA *E-FILED - 9/30/09* CASE NO.: C-06-04381-RMW (Criminal No.: CR-05-00624-RMW) ORDER DENYING MOTION ATTACKING SENTENCE (28 U.S.C. § 2255) (Docket Nos.: 1, 16) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Copy of Order Mailed to: Pearl Zamora 31160 Oakhill Way Hayward, CA 94544 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?