Tucker v. Apple Computer, Inc.

Filing 56

ORDER CLOSING CASE. On March 20, 2007, the Court consolidated this case with an earlier filed case, C 05-0037.(See Docket Item No. 44.) In light of that Order, this case should have been closed since it has been subsumed into the Lead Case. Accordingly, the Court now orders the Clerk of Court to close 06-4457. Signed by Judge James Ware on 9/30/2009. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/30/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Melanie Tucker v. Apple, Inc., Defendant. / Plaintiff, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION NO. C 06-04457 JW ORDER CLOSING CASE United United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 On March 20, 2007, the Court consolidated this case with an earlier filed case, C 05-0037. (See Docket Item No. 44.) In light of that Order, this case should have been closed since it has been subsumed into the Lead Case. Accordingly, the Court now orders the Clerk of Court to close 064457. Dated: September 30, 2009 JAMES WARE United States District Judge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT COPIES OF THIS ORDER HAVE BEEN DELIVERED TO: Adam Richard Sand invalidaddress@invalidaddress.com Andrew S. Friedman afriedman@bffb.com Arthur William Lazear awl@hoffmanandlazear.com Bonny E. Sweeney bonnys@csgrr.com Christopher M. Burke cburke@scott-scott.com Elaine A. Ryan eryan@bffb.com Gregory Steven Weston gweston@csgrr.com John J. Stoia jstoia@csgrr.com Robert Allan Mittelstaedt ramittelstaedt@jonesday.com Tracy Strong invalidaddress@invalidaddress.com Dated: September 30, 2009 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk By: /s/ JW Chambers Elizabeth Garcia Courtroom Deputy United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?