Alecci v. Anderson et al

Filing 6

STIPULATION AND ORDER 5 Extending Time for Defendants to Respond to Complaint. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 8/17/06. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/17/2006) Modified on 8/21/2006 (sp, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
Case 5:06-cv-04649-JF Document 6 Filed 08/17/2006 Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 GEORGE A. RILEY (S.B. #118304) griley@omm.com LUANN L. SIMMONS (S.B. #203526) lsimmons@omm.com O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP Embarcadero Center West 275 Battery Street San Francisco, California 94111-3305 Telephone: (415) 984-8700 Facsimile: (415) 984-8701 DAVID M. FURBUSH (S.B. #83447) dfurbush@omm.com O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP 2765 Sand Hill Road Menlo Park, California 94025 Telephone: (650) 473-2600 Facsimile: (650) 473-2601 Attorneys for Nominal Defendant APPLE COMPUTER, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION *E-FILED - 8/17/06* JEFFREY ALECCI, Derivatively on Behalf of APPLE COMPUTER, INC., Plaintiff, v. FRED D. ANDERSON, WILLIAM V. CAMPBELL, MILLARD S. DREXLER, STEVEN P. JOBS, ARTHUR D. LEVINSON, JEROME B. YORK, TIMOTHY D. COOK, AVADIS TEVANIAN, JR., JONATHAN RUBINSTEIN, RONALD B. JOHNSON, PETER OPPENHEIMER, MITCHELL MANDICH, ROBERT M. CALDERONI, JAMES J. BUCKLEY, DANIEL L. EILERS and G. FREDERICK FORSYTH, Defendants, - and APPLE COMPUTER, INC., Nominal Defendant. Case No. 5:06-cv-04649-RMW STIPULATION AND [] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT STIPULATION & ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT - 5:06-cv-04649-RMW Case 5:06-cv-04649-JF Document 6 Filed 08/17/2006 Page 2 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2006; IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Jeffrey Alecci ("Alecci") and Nominal Defendant Apple Computer, Inc. ("Apple") as follows: WHEREAS, Alecci filed his Complaint against Defendants on July 31, 2006, and served it on July 31, 2006; WHEREAS, Apple is currently scheduled to respond to Alecci's Complaint by August 21, WHEREAS, Apple has obtained authorization to accept service of process on behalf of several of the individual defendants, is in the process of seeking such authority from others, and is discussing representation issues with the individual defendants; WHEREAS, Alecci has agreed to extend to October 6, 2006, the time for all defendants to move or plead in response to Alecci's Complaint; NOW THEREFORE, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-1, the parties hereby stipulate as follows: All defendants who have been served to date, and all defendants who shall subsequently accept service and request to be covered by this stipulation, shall have an extension of time to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff Alecci's Complaint to October 6, 2006. IT IS SO STIPULATED. Dated: August 14, 2006 GEORGE A. RILEY DAVID M. FURBUSH LUANN L. SIMMONS O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP By: /s/ Luann L. Simmons Luann L. Simmons Attorneys for Nominal Defendant APPLE COMPUTER, INC. STIPULATION & ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT - 5:06-cv-04649-RMW Case 5:06-cv-04649-JF Document 6 Filed 08/17/2006 Page 3 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: August 14, 2006 WILLIAM S. LERACH TRAVIS E. DOWNS III SHAWN A. WILLIAMS LERACH COUGLIN STOIA GELLER RUDMAN & ROBBINS LLP By: /s/ Travis E. Downs III Travis E. Downs III Attorneys for Plaintiff JEFFREY ALECCI CERTIFICATION OF CONCURRENCE I attest under penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from Travis E. Downs III. Dated: August 14, 2006 GEORGE A. RILEY DAVID M. FURBUSH LUANN L. SIMMONS O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP By: /s/ Luann L. Simmons Luann L. Simmons Attorneys for Nominal Defendant APPLE COMPUTER, INC. ORDER Pursuant to stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: ____________________ 8/17/06 /s/ Ronald M. Whyte ______________________________________ Honorable Ronald M. Whyte United States District Judge SF1:639725.1 -2STIPULATION & ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT - 5:06-cv-04649-RMW

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?