Macrovision Corporation v. Intertrust Technologies Corporation

Filing 8

ORDER GRANTING re 7 Stipulation to Extend Time to Answer Complaint filed by Intertrust Technologies Corporation. Signed by Judge James Ware on 8/22/06. (sp, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/22/2006)

Download PDF
Macrovision Corporation v. Intertrust Technologies Corporation Doc. 8 Case 5:06-cv-04659-JW Document 8 Filed 08/22/2006 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Linda J. Thayer, Esq. (SBN 195,115) linda.thayer@finnegan.com FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER, L.L.P. Stanford Research Park 3300 Hillview Avenue Palo Alto, California 94304-1203 Telephone: (650) 849-6600 Facsimile: (650) 849-6666 Barbara C. McCurdy, Esq. (Admitted ProHac Vice) barbara.mccurdy@finnegan.com FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER, L.L.P. 901 New York Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20001 Telephone: (202) 408-4000 Facsimile: (202) 408-4400 Attorneys for Defendant INTERTRUST TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION MACROVISION CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. INTERTRUST TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION, Defendant. CASE NO. CV 06-04659 JW STIPULATION [AND PROPOSED ORDER] TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER CASE NO. 06-04659 JW Dockets.Justia.com Case 5:06-cv-04659-JW Document 8 Filed 08/22/2006 Page 2 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-1(a), Defendant Intertrust Technologies Corporation ("Intertrust") has requested, and Plaintiff Macrovision Corporation ("Macrovision") has agreed, to extend the time for Intertrust to respond to Macrovision's Complaint from August 22, 2006 to August 28, 2006. This extension will not alter the date of any event or any deadline already fixed by Court order. Accordingly, it is hereby stipulated that Intertrust has until August 28, 2006 to respond to the Complaint. By her signature below, counsel for Defendant swears under penalty of perjury that counsel for Plaintiff concurred in the filing of this document. DATED: August 21, 2006 FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP By /s/ Linda J. Thayer Attorneys for Defendant Intertrust Technologies Corporation. DATED: August 21, 2006 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART OLIVER & HEDGES, LLP By /s/ Michael D. Powell Attorneys for Plaintiff Macrovision Corporation [PROPOSED] ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED Dated: August 22, 2006 ____________________________________________ James Ware United States District Judge 1 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER CASE NO. 06-04659 JW

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?