In re Apple Inc. Securities Litigation

Filing 126

STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING SCHEDULING MATTERS (approving 124 ). Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 10/5/2010. (jflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/5/2010)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

GEORGE A. RILEY (State Bar No. 118304) O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP Two Embarcadero Center 28th Floor San Francisco, California 94111-3828 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] E-Mail: [e-mail] Attorneys for Defendant APPLE INC.

**E-Filed 10/5/2010**

JAY W. EISENHOFER (admitted pro hac vice) MICHAEL J. BARRY (admitted pro hac vice) GRANT & EISENHOFER P.A. Chase Manhattan Centre 1201 N. Market Street Wilmington, Delaware 19801 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] E-Mail: [e-mail] [e-mail] Attorneys for Lead Plaintiff THE NEW YORK CITY EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM (Additional Counsel Listed on Signature Page) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION IN RE APPLE INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: ALL ACTIONS Case No. C06-05208-JF CLASS ACTION STIPULATION AND ------------------[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING SCHEDULING MATTERS Department: Ctrm. 3, 5th Floor Judge: Honorable Jeremy Fogel

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER C06-05208-JF

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

WHEREAS, on August 24, 2006, plaintiffs Vogel and Mahoney filed a class action complaint in this Court alleging that certain defendants violated the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act"), including § 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, and § 20(a) ("Vogel I"); WHEREAS, on June 27, 2008, plaintiffs Vogel and Mahoney filed a new class action complaint in this Court alleging that certain defendants violated the Exchange Act, including § 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, and § 20(a) ("Vogel II"); WHEREAS, on April 8, 2010, this Court entered an order consolidating Vogel I and Vogel II, extending defendants' time to respond to the complaint to June 25, 2010, and setting a briefing schedule in the event that defendants respond to the complaint by filing motions; WHEREAS, on May 14, 2010, plaintiffs filed a [Corrected] First Amended Consolidated Class Action Complaint ("Complaint"); WHEREAS, on August 31, 2010, the Court entered an order continuing a Case Management Conference scheduled for September 3, 2010, at 10:30 a.m., to September 24, 2010, at 10:30 a.m., and extending defendants' time to respond to the Complaint to October 1, 2010; WHEREAS, September 20, 2010, the Clerk of the Court issued a Clerk's Notice continuing the Case Management Conference set for September 24, 2010, to October 1, 2010, at 10:30 a.m.; WHEREAS, on September 28, 2010, the parties filed a Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement and requested entry of an order preliminarily approving the settlement, directing notice of the settlement, and scheduling a settlement fairness hearing; WHEREAS, on September 29, 2010, the Court entered an order setting the hearing on plaintiffs' unopposed motion for preliminary approval of the settlement for October 7, 2010, at 10:00 a.m., and continued the Case Management Conference set for October 1, 2010, to October 7, 2010, to be heard with the motion; NOW, THEREFORE, counsel for plaintiffs, counsel for Apple Inc., and counsel for individual defendants Fred D. Anderson, William V. Campbell, Millard S. Drexler, Nancy R.

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER C06-05208-JF

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Heinen, Steven P. Jobs, Arthur D. Levinson and Jerome B. York hereby stipulate and agree, and respectfully request that the Court enter an order, as follows: 1. Defendants shall not be required to respond to the Complaint pending the Court's

consideration of the proposed settlement. Dated: October 1, 2010 GEORGE A. RILEY O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP By: /s/ George A. Riley George A. Riley

Attorneys for Defendant APPLE INC. Dated: October 1, 2010 DOUGLAS R. YOUNG (S.B. #73248) FARELLA BRAUN & MARTEL LLP Russ Building 235 Montgomery Street, 17th floor San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] E-Mail: [e-mail] By: /s/ Douglas R. Young Douglas R. Young

Attorneys for Defendants STEVEN P. JOBS, WILLIAM V. CAMPBELL, MILLARD S. DREXLER, ARTHUR D. LEVINSON and JEROME B. YORK Dated: October 1, 2010 JEROME C. ROTH (S.B. #159483) YOHANCE C. EDWARDS (S.B. #237244) MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP 560 Mission Street, 27th Floor San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] E-Mail: [e-mail] [e-mail] By: /s/ Yohance C. Edwards Yohance C. Edwards

Attorneys for Defendants FRED D. ANDERSON and NANCY R. HEINEN -2STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER C06-05208-JF

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Dated: October 1, 2010

JAY W. EISENHOFER (admitted pro hac vice) MICHAEL J. BARRY (admitted pro hac vice) GRANT & EISENHOFER P.A. Chase Manhattan Centre 1201 N. Market Street Wilmington, Delaware 19801 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] E-Mail: [e-mail] [e-mail] By: /s/ Michael J. Barry Michael J. Barry

MERRILL GLEN EMERICK (SB# 117248) ANDERLINI & EMERICK LLP 411 Borel Avenue, Suite 501 San Mateo, California 94402 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Lead Plaintiff THE NEW YORK CITY EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM I, George A. Riley, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Regarding Scheduling Matters. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that Douglas R. Young, Yohance C. Edwards and Michael J. Barry have concurred in this filing. By: /s/ George A. Riley________________ George A. Riley

ORDER PURSUANT TO THE PARTIES' STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. Oct. 5 DATED: ________________, 2010

The Honorable Jeremy Fogel United States District Judge

MP1:1199544.1

-3-

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER C06-05208-JF