Bates v. City of San Jose et al
Filing
64
ORDER for withdrawal of counsel and leave to proceed pro se. Signed by Judge Whyte on 7/10/2013. (rmwlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/10/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
12
FEDERICK BATES,
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
16
Case No. C-06-05302-RMW
ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO
PROCEED PRO SE
v.
CITY OF SAN JOSE et al.,
Defendants.
17
18
Although Frederick Bates' attorney of record, Stuart Kirchick, has not formerly moved to
19
withdraw from the case, it is clear that Bates is proceeding in post-judgment matters without the
20
advice of counsel and wishes to proceed pro se. See Dkt. No. 57. Therefore, the court orders Stuart
21
Kirchick withdrawn from the case and that Bates may proceed pro se.
22
23
24
Dated: July 10, 2013
_________________________________
RONALD M. WHYTE
United States District Judge
25
26
27
28
ORDER
Case No. C-06-05302-RMW
SW
-1-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?