Rahama v. Archer et al

Filing 30

ORDER RESCHEDULING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE. Settlement Conference set for 12/30/2008 09:30 AM. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 10/29/08. (rssec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/29/2008)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 AMIR RAHAMA, Plaintiff, v. OFFICER ARCHER, et al., Defendants. _____________________________________/ TO ALL PARTIES AND COUNSEL OF RECORD: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the settlement conference previously scheduled for November 24, 2008 in Courtroom 4, Fifth Floor, 280 South First Street, San Jose, California has been rescheduled to December 30, 2008 at 9:30 a.m. Counsel who will try the case shall appear at the settlement conference with the parties and with the person or persons having full authority to negotiate and to settle the case. Settlement conference statements, if not previously submitted, are due seven (7) days prior to the settlement conference. All other provisions of this Court's Order, dated July 21, 2008, shall remain in effect. No. C 06-05405 JW (HRL) ORDER RESCHEDULING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA *E-FILED* October 29, 2008 United States District Court 12 For the Northern District of California 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The parties shall notify Magistrate Judge Seeborg's chambers immediately if this case settles prior to the date set for settlement conference. Dated: October 29, 2008 RICHARD SEEBORG United States Magistrate Judge 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT NOTICE OF THIS ORDER WAS ELECTRONICALLY PROVIDED TO Anthony Boskovich policemisconduct@compuserve.com cao.main@sanjoseca.gov CAO.Main@sanjoseca.gov Nkia Desiree Richardson Robert Baker Burchfiel Dated: October 29, 2008 CHAMBERS OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE RICHARD SEEBORG By: /s/ BAK 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?