Doe v. City of San Jose et al
Filing
80
ORDER vacating hearing date. (rmwlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/17/2008)
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
ORDER VACATING HEARING No. C-06-06307 RMW TSF
E-FILED on
11/17/2008
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
JOHN DOE, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF SAN JOSE, et al. Defendants.
No. C-06-06307 RMW ORDER VACATING HEARING
The City's motion for summary judgment presently set for hearing on November 21, 2008 is hereby submitted on the papers without oral argument. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). The hearing date of November 21, 2008 is vacated. If, upon consideration of the matter, the court deems that oral argument is necessary or would be helpful to the court, the matter will be reset for hearing no earlier than December 5, 2008.
DATED:
11/17/2008 RONALD M. WHYTE United States District Judge
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Notice of this document has been electronically sent to: Counsel for Defendants: Clifford S. Greenberg cao.main@sanjoseca.gov
Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel that have not registered for e-filing under the court's CM/ECF program. Notice of this document has been mailed to: Plaintiff: Larry Lundy 1071 Culloden Court San Jose, CA 95121 and Larry Lundy Mother Olson's Inn 202 S. 11th Street San Jose, CA 95112
Dated:
11/17/2008
TSF Chambers of Judge Whyte
ORDER VACATING HEARING No. C-06-06307 RMW TSF
2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
