Jemery James Ehart, et al v. Ghillie Suits.Com, Inc. et al
Filing
113
AMENDED ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO VOLUNTARILY DISMISS DEFENDANTS, THE GARLAND COMPANY D/B/A FIRE SHIELD WEST AND GARY B. CROSSLAND Jace Contracting Services, Inc. aka Jace Contracting without prejudice and without costs re 112 Proposed Order. Signed by Judge James Ware on 1/8/2009. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/9/2009)
I
2
5
CRAIG NEEDHAM (SBN s2010) KTRSTEN FrSH (SB #2t7940)
1960 The Alameda, Suite 210
San Jose,
UNIT ED
NEEDHAM, DAVIS, KEPNER, & YOUNG, LLp
S
S DISTRICT TE C TA
5
6 7
8
San Antonio, Texas 78216 Telephone : (210) 225 -3121 Fax: (210) 225-6235
ER
N
Attorneys
9
l0
1l
12
for Pløíntffi , JEREMY JAMES EHART, KRISTY EHART, and STEVEN RYAN McCLANAHAN
F D IS T IC T O R
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
l3
t4 l5
JEREMY JAMES EHART, KRISTY EHART, And STEVEN RYAN
SAN JOSE DIVISION No. 5:06-CV-6507-JV/
McCLANAHAN,
I6
Plaintiffs,
t7
vs.
l8
T9
20
2T
GHILLIE SUITS.COM INC.; TODD MUIRHEAD; NEW YORK FIRE-SHIELD INCORPORATED; WACKENHUT SERVICES, INCORPORATED; THE WACKENHUT CORPORATION; and
DOES l-50,inclusive,
Defendants.
DISMISS DEFENDANTS. THE GARLAND COMPANY D/B/A F'IRE SHIELD WEST AND GARY B. CROSSLAND
22 23 24 25 26 27
AMENDED ORDER
The Order previously entered on December 16, 2008, on PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO
VOLI-JNTARILY DISMISS DEFENDANTS, THE GARLAND COMPANY DIBIA FIRE SHIELD
WEST AND GARY B. CROSSLAND and the agreement of the parties, is revised as follows:
Now comes the Court, being fully advised of the issues and the agreement of the parties, it is
A
C
LI
FO
TINSMAN & SCIANO,INC. DANIEL J.T. SCIANO (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) 1 0l 07 McAllister Freeway
mes Wa Judge Ja
re
Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss Defendants, The Garland Company
d/b/a Fire Shield West and Garv Crossland CASE NO. 5:06-CV-6507-JW
R NIA
4
Fax:
Tel:
CA95126 (408)244-2166 (408)244-7815
OO IT IS S
D RDERE
RT U O
NO
RT
H
-l-
I
2
3
hereby ordered that Defendants, THE GARLAND COMPANY D/B/A FIRE SHIELD WEST and
GARY B. CROSSLAND,
Defendants,
úa voluntarily dismissed without prejudice and without costs.
B.
THE GARLAND COMPANY DIB/A FIRE SHIELD WEST and GARY
4
5
CROSSLAND and JACE CONTRACTING SERVICES, [NC. alWa JACE CONTRACTING are
found to have tolled and expressly extended the applicable statute of limitations during the period
commencing on the date the original complaint bearing Case No. C 06 06507 (JW) was filed in the
6 7
8
United States District Court, Northern District of Califomia, San Jose Division, and ending 30 days
after the date a trial court judgment is signed and entered, or the date the Plaintifß settle with the
last remaining Defendant currently joined, whichever date is earlier.
9
l0
ll
t2
13
Dated: January 8, 2009
Date
________________________________ Ju ge of the JAMESdWARE U.S. District Court United States District Judge
t4
t5
t6 t7
l8
t9
20
2t
22
23
24
25
26 27
-2Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss Defendants, The Garland Company dlblaFire Shield West and Garv
Crossland
CASE NO. 5:06-CV-6507-JW
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?