Robinson v. Carey

Filing 33

ORDER by Judge Ronald M. Whyte Granting 31 Motion for Fourth Extension of Time to File Opposition to Motion to Dismiss. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/24/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 *E-FILED - 4/24/09* IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WHITT DEWANE ROBINSON, Petitioner, vs. TOM L. CAREY, Warden, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. C 06-6960 RMW (PR) ORDER GRANTING FOURTH EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS Docket No. 31 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. On September 10, 2008, respondent filed a motion to dismiss the petition as untimely. Thereafter, petitioner was granted three extensions of time to file his opposition. On April 9, 2009, petitioner filed a fourth amended request for an extension of time. Petitioner then filed his opposition to respondent's motion to dismiss on April 17, 2009. The court GRANTS petitioner's fourth amended request for an extension of time (docket no. 31). Petitioner's opposition, filed on April 17, 2009, is deemed timely. In accordance with the court's March 18, 2009 order, respondent shall file his reply within fifteen (15) days of April 17, 2009, the filing date of the opposition. \\\ \\\ Order Granting Fourth Extension of Time to File Opposition to Motion to Dismiss 1 P:\PRO-SE\SJ.Rmw\HC.06\Robinson960eot5.wpd 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 This order terminates docket no. 31. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 4/24/09 RONALD M. WHYTE United States District Judge Order Granting Fourth Extension of Time to File Opposition to Motion to Dismiss 2 P:\PRO-SE\SJ.Rmw\HC.06\Robinson960eot5.wpd

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?