Christine Rios v. The City of San Jose et al

Filing 45

ORDER by Judge Richard Seeborg granting 42 Motion to Appoint Guardian ad Litem and Petition to Approve Compromise of Pending Action on Behalf of Minor. (rssec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/18/2008)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 CHRISTINE RIOS, et al., v. Plaintiffs, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION NO. C 06-7036 RS ORDER GRANTING: (1) MOTION TO APPOINT GUARDIAN AD LITEM; AND (2) PLAINTIFFS' PETITION TO APPROVE COMPROMISE OF PENDING ACTION ON BEHALF OF MINOR / Plaintiffs seek to appoint Christine Silva Rios as the guardian ad litem for Anthony Angel de Silva Rios, her minor son, and to approve a settlement on his behalf. On December 18, 2008, a hearing was held where plaintiffs' counsel and defendants' counsel were present. Christine Silva Rios appeared telephonically. Christine Silva Rios' address is 307 1/2 Colorado Street, Apartment C, Fruitland, Idaho 83619. She lives there with Anthony Angel de Silva Rios, who is seven-years-old (DOB: December 24, 2000). Christine Silva Rios is a competent and responsible person and meets all the qualifications required by this Court to be appointed a guardian ad litem. Accordingly, Christine Silva Rios' petition is granted, and the guardian ad litem's power to execute the settlement agreement and release is approved. *E-FILED 12/18/08* United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 THE CITY OF SAN JOSE, et al., Defendants. 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 18, 2008 RICHARD SEEBORG United States Magistrate Judge United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER GRANTING: (1) MOTION TO APPOINT GUARDIAN AD LITEM; AND (2) PLAINTIFFS' PETITION TO APPROVE COMPROMISE OF PENDING ACTION ON BEHALF OF MINOR C 06-7036 RS 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?