Tyco Thermal Controls, LLC v. Redwood Industrials et al

Filing 234

ORDER BY JUDGE JEREMY FOGEL RE 72 TYCO'S PENDING MOTION FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION. (jflc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/17/2010)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
1

**E-Filed 8/17/2010**

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION TYCO THERMAL CONTROLS LLC, Plaintiff, v. REDWOOD INDUSTRIALS, et al., Re: Docket No. 72 Defendants. ROWE INDUSTRIES, INC., Counter-Claimant, v. TYCO THERMAL CONTROLS, LLC, Counter-Defendant. On April 15, 2010, the Court issued an order addressing six separate motions filed by the parties to the instant action. At the same time, the Court deferred determination of a motion for summary adjudication brought by Plaintiff Tyco Thermal Controls LLC ("Tyco") against Defendant Rowe Industries, Inc. ("Rowe"). See Dkt. No. 180 at 2 n. 2 ("Tyco also moves for summary adjudication of its substantive CERCLA claims against Rowe. For the reasons Case Number C 06-07164 JF (PVT) ORDER1 RE TYCO'S PENDING MOTION FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION

This disposition is not designated for publication in the official reports.

C a se No. CV 06-07164 JF (PVT) O R D E R RE TYCO'S PENDING MOTION FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION (J FL C 1 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

discussed on the record at oral argument, determination of that motion will be deferred pending additional discovery and investigation of new developments at the Site.") Good cause therefor appearing, Tyco's pending motion for summary adjudication against Rowe will be administratively terminated without prejudice. When and if it concludes that the motion is ripe for determination, Tyco may re-notice the motion. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: 8/17/2010 ____________________________ JEREMY FOGEL United States District Judge

2
C a se No. CV 06-07164 JF (PVT) O R D E R RE TYCO'S PENDING MOTION FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION (J FL C 1 )