In re FINISAR CORP. DERIVATIVE LITIGATION

Filing 101

JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Whyte on 09/22/09. (rmwlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/22/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JUDGMENT--No. C-06-07660 RMW LJP E-FILED on 9/22/09 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION In re FINISAR CORP. DERIVATIVE LITIGATION, ______________________________________ This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS. No. C-06-07660 RMW JUDGMENT On September 22, 2009, the court entered its order granting defendants' motions to dismiss. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ordered that plaintiffs take nothing by way of their complaint and that judgment be entered in favor of all defendants. DATED: 9/22/09 RONALD M. WHYTE United States District Judge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Notice of this document has been electronically sent to: Counsel for Plaintiffs: Aelish Marie Baig Travis E. Downs, III Lester Rene Hooker Alan Roth Plutzik Seth Adam Safier Shawn A. Williams Monique C. Winkler Counsel for Defendants: David Banie Arlena Victoria Carrozzi David M. Doyle Lawrence T. Hoyle , Jr. David Allen Priebe Shirli Fabbri Weiss Lloyd Winaer david.banie@dlapiper.com arlena.carrozzi@dlapiper.com david.doyle@dlapiper.com lhoyle@hoylelawfirm.com david.priebe@dlapiper.com shirli.weiss@dlapiper.com lwinawer@goodwinprocter.com AelishB@csgrr.com travisd@csgrr.com l hooker@saxenawhite.com aplutzik@bramsonplutzik.com seth@gutridesafier.com shawnw@csgrr.com shawnw@csgrr.com Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel that have not registered for e-filing under the court's CM/ECF program. Dated: 9/22/09 LJP Chambers of Judge Whyte JUDGMENT--No. C-06-07660 RMW LJP 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?