Gonzales v. Google Inc.
Filing
11
ORDER by Judge James Ware continuing hearing on motion to compel; setting briefing schedule. (jwlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/2/2006)
Gonzales v. Google Inc.
Doc. 11
Case 5:06-mc-80006-JW
Document 11
Filed 02/02/2006
Page 1 of 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
United United States District Court
11
For the Northern District of California
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
ALBERTO R. GONZALES, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States, Plaintiff, v. GOOGLE, INC.,
NO. CV 06-8006MISC JW
ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON MOTION TO COMPEL; SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE
/ The hearing on Plaintiff's motion to compel noticed for February 27, 2006 is continued to March 13, 2006 at 9:00 a.m. Defendant shall file any opposition to Plaintiff's motion on or before February 17, 2006. Plaintiff's reply in support of its motion shall be filed on or before February 24, 2006. Any briefs by amici curiae are limited to 25 pages, and shall be filed no later than February 24, 2006. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1 (b), additional chambers copies of all documents must be clearly marked and delivered to the Office of the Clerk.
Defendant.
Dated: February 2, 2006
06eciv80006ctdhearing
/s/ James Ware JAMES WARE United States District Judge
Dockets.Justia.com
Case 5:06-mc-80006-JW
Document 11
Filed 02/02/2006
Page 2 of 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT COPIES OF THIS ORDER HAVE BEEN DELIVERED TO: Joel McElvain: joel.l.mcelvain@usdoj.gov Albert Gidari, Jr.: agidari@perkinscoie.com Lisa Delehunt: ldelehunt@perkinscoie.com Dated: February 2, 2006 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk By:_/s/ JW Chambers________ Melissa Peralta Courtroom Deputy
United States District Court
11
For the Northern District of California
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?