Gonzales v. Google Inc.

Filing 18

STIPULATION Regarding the Length of the Movant's Reply Brief by Alberto R. Gonzales. (McElvain, Joel) (Filed on 2/24/2006)

Download PDF
Gonzales v. Google Inc. Doc. 18 Case 5:06-mc-80006-JW Document 18 Filed 02/24/2006 Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PETER D. KEISLER Assistant Attorney General THEODORE HIRT Assistant Branch Director JOEL McELVAIN, D.C. Bar No. 448431 Trial Attorney U.S. Department of Justice Civil Division, Federal Programs Branch 20 Massachusetts Ave., NW Washington, DC 20001 Telephone: (202) 514-2988 Fax: (202) 616-8202 Email: Joel.L.McElvain@usdoj.gov Attorneys for Alberto R. Gonzales ALBERT GIDARI, JR., pro hac vice Perkins Coie LLP 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 4800 Seattle, WA 98101 Telephone: (206) 359-8000 Fax: (206) 359-9000 Email: AGidari@perkinscoie.com LISA DELEHUNT, Bar No. 228551 Perkins Coie LLP 180 Townsend Street, Third Floor San Francisco, CA 94107 Telephone: (415) 344-7000 Fax: (415) 344-7050 Email: LDelehunt@perkinscoie.com Attorneys for Google Inc. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (SAN JOSE DIVISION) ALBERTO R. GONZALES, in his official ) capacity as ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE ) UNITED STATES, ) ) Movant, ) ) v. ) ) GOOGLE INC., ) ) Respondent. ) ) Case No. 5:06-mc-80006-JW Stipulation Regarding the Length of the Movant's Reply Brief Hearing: Time: March 13, 2006 9:00 a.m. Gonzales v. Google Inc. No. 5:6-mc-80006-JW Stipulation re Briefing Dockets.Justia.com Case 5:06-mc-80006-JW Document 18 Filed 02/24/2006 Page 2 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED between and among the parties hereto, by and through their respective undersigned attorneys, that the Movant, Alberto R. Gonzales, may file, in support of his motion to compel, a reply brief of a length not to exceed 21 pages. Counsel for the Respondent, Google Inc., respectfully states that she has no objection to the filing of a reply brief of this length. Counsel for the Movant respectfully informs the Court that there is good cause for this stipulation, as the Movant is required to reply both to the Respondent's brief, which is 21 pages in length, and to a brief that is 11 pages in length that was filed in this action by the plaintiffs in ACLU, et al. v. Gonzales, Civ. Action No. 98-5591 (E.D. Pa.). Respectfully submitted, /s/ JOEL McELVAIN Attorney for Movant Dated: February 24, 2006 /s/ LISA DELEHUNT Attorney for Respondent Dated: February 24, 2006 I hereby attest that I have on file all holograph signatures for any signatures indicated by a "conformed" signature (/s/) within this efiled document. /s/ JOEL McELVAIN ************************************************************************ ORDER Pursuant to stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: Hon. JAMES WARE United States District Judge -2Gonzales v. Google Inc. No. 5:6-mc-80006-JW Stipulation re Briefing Case 5:06-mc-80006-JW Document 18 Filed 02/24/2006 Page 3 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that I have made service of the foregoing Stipulation Regarding Briefing Schedule depositing in Federal Express at Washington, D.C., on February 24, 2006, true, exact copies thereof, enclosed in an envelope with postage thereon prepaid, addressed to: Albert Gidari, Jr., Esquire Perkins Coie, LLP 1201 Third Avenue Seattle, Washington 98101-3099 (Counsel for Respondent Google Inc.) Lisa Delehunt, Esquire Perkins Coie, LLP 180 Townsend Street, Third Floor San Francisco, CA 94107 (Counsel for Respondent Google Inc.) Aden J. Fine, Esquire American Civil Liberties Union Foundation 125 Broad Street New York, New York 10004 (Counsel for Plaintiffs, ACLU v. Gonzalez, E.D. Pa. No. 98-cv-5591) /s/ JOEL McELVAIN Attorney Gonzales v. Google Inc. No. 5:6-mc-80006-JW Stipulation re Briefing

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?