O'Haire v. Napa State Hospital et al

Filing 118

ORDER by Judge Ronald M. Whyte Granting 115 Motion for Extension of Time to File; Denying 116 Motion to Compel. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/9/2010)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Order Granting Motion for Enlargement of Time; Denying Motion to Compel Response to Discovery P:\PRO-SE\SJ.Rmw\CR.07\OHaire002misc2.wpd

*E-FILED - 2/9/10*

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PAUL D. O'HAIRE, Plaintiff, v. NAPA STATE HOSPITAL, et. al., Defendants.

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

No. C 07-0002 RMW (PR) ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME; DENYING MOTION TO COMPEL RESPONSE TO DISCOVERY (Docket Nos. 115, 116)

Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed the instant civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On December 23, 2009, plaintiff filed a motion for enlargement of time in which to oppose defendants' motion for summary judgment. Good cause being shown, plaintiff's motion is GRANTED. Plaintiff's opposition shall be filed within thirty days of the filing date of this order. Defendants shall file their reply fifteen days thereafter. On January 4, 2010, plaintiff filed a motion to compel response to pending discovery. On January 5, 2010, the court denied plaintiff's previous motions to compel discovery. In the present motion, plaintiff raised nothing new that was not previously considered in the court's January 5 order. Accordingly, for the reasons stated in the court's January 5, 2010 order, plaintiff's motion to compel is DENIED.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

This order terminates docket numbers 115 and 116. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: 2/8/10 RONALD M. WHYTE United States District Judge

Order Granting Motion for Enlargement of Time; Denying Motion to Compel Response to Discovery 2 P:\PRO-SE\SJ.Rmw\CR.07\OHaire002misc2.wpd