Acero v. County of Santa Clara et al

Filing 83

ORDER DENYING CONTINUATION OF DEADLINES; CONTINUING PRELIMINARY PRETRIALCONFERENCE re 82 Stipulation. The Court DENIES the parties' Stipulation to continue existing Case Schedule for four months since the Court has previously granted the parti es' multiple extensions. The Court finds good cause to continue the Preliminary Pretrial Conference currently set for August 31, 2009. The parties shall comply with the schedule as follows: Close of All Discovery due by 9/21/2009. Last Date to H ear Dispositive Motions due by 11/16/2009. Preliminary Pretrial Conference Statement due 9/4/2009. Preliminary Pretrial Conference set for 9/14/2009 11:00 AM in Courtroom 8, 4th Floor, San Jose. Signed by Judge James Ware on 7/29/2009. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/4/2009)

Case5:07-cv-00029-JW Document82

Filed07/02/09 Page1 of 3

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
A N N M IL L E R R A V E L C o u n ty C o u n s e l C o u n ty o f S a n ta C la r a S a n Jo s e , C a l i fo r n i a

UNIT ED

1

N

F D IS T IC T O R

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (SAN JOSE)

LONGINO ACERO, JR., Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, et al., Defendants.

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

No.

C07-00029 JW

STIDULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OR P ER DENYING CONTINUATION OF REGARDING CONTINUING CASE DEADLINES; CONTINUING SCHEDULE DATES BY FOUR MONTHS PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL CONFERENCE

The parties stipulate as follows: The Court DENIES the parties' Stipulation to continue existing Case Schedule for four 1. The parties have scheduled a settlement conference with Magistrate Judge Richard months since the Court has previously granted the parties' multiple extensions. However, since Seeborg for his earliest available week, namely August 28, 2009. the Settlement Conference is set for August 28, 2009, the Court finds good cause to continue the 2. The previous settlement conference was of limited value because Mr. Acero's then Preliminary Pretrial Conference currently set for August 31, 2009. The parties shall comply counsel had just resigned and Mr. Acero was in pro per. with the.scheduleparties are concerned that time and money expended in discovery and the expert 3 The as follows: disclosure / deposition process would be better spent attempting to resolve the case. // // // //
S tip u l a t io n Re Continuing Case S c h e d u le Dates by Four Months

1

A

ANN MILLER RAVEL, County Counsel (S.B. #62139) MARK F. BERNAL, Deputy County Counsel (S.B. #173923) ERED OFFICE OF THE COUNTY COUNSEL O ORD D 70 West Hedding, East Wing, 9th Floor IT IS S DIFIE San Jose, California 95110-1770 AS MO Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] re mes Wa Judge Ja Attorneys for Defendant COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA

S

S DISTRICT TE C TA

ER

C

C 0 7 -0 0 0 2 9 JW

LI

FO

R NIA

RT U O

NO

RT

H

Case5:07-cv-00029-JW Document82

Filed07/02/09 Page2 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
A N N M IL L E R R A V E L C o u n ty C o u n s e l C o u n ty o f S a n ta C la r a S a n Jo s e , C a l i fo r n i a

4.

The current case schedule is as follows: Close of All Discovery (¶ 9). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . September 21, 2009 Last Date for Hearing Dispositive Motions (¶ 10).. . . . November 16, 2009 (60 days after the Close of All Discovery) S ugu mbe 14, 2009 Preliminary Pretrial Conference at 11 a.m. (¶ 12). . . . . . . Aeptest 31,r2009 (30 days before the Close of All Discovery) S ugu mbe 4, 2009 Preliminary Pretrial Conference Statements (¶ 11). . . . . . Aeptest 21,r2009 (Due 10 days before conference)

5. Because expert disclosures must be made roughly two months before close of Dated: July 29, 2009 __________________________ discovery and the parties have additionalJAMES WARE discovery and analysis they would like to perform United States District Judge should settlement talks be unsuccessful, the parties would request that the court add four months to the current schedule. Thus, the parties are requesting that the close of discovery be on or about January 21, 2010, and that all other dates be similarly moved four months later. I hereby attest that I have on file the holograph signature indicated by a "conformed" signature (/S/) within this e-filed document. Dated: July 2, 2009 Respectfully submitted, ANN MILLER RAVEL County Counsel By: /S/ MARK F. BERNAL Deputy County Counsel Attorneys for Defendant COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Dated: July 2, 2009 By: /S/ MICHAEL MILLEN, ESQ. Attorney for Plaintiff

ORDER Good cause appearing, the court hereby orders that the case schedule dates previously set by this court be amended as follows: Close of All Discovery (¶ 9). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . January 21, 2010 Last Date for Hearing Dispositive Motions (¶ 10).. . . . . . March 16, 2010 (60 days after the Close of All Discovery) //
S tip u l a t io n Re Continuing Case S c h e d u le Dates by Four Months

2

C 0 7 -0 0 0 2 9 JW