Acero v. County of Santa Clara et al

Filing 87

ORDER CONTINUING PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL CONFERENCE re 86 Pretrial Memorandum filed by Longino Acero, Jr. The Court continues the 9/14/2009 Pretrial Conference to 10/5/2009 11:00 AM in Courtroom 8, 4th Floor, San Jose. The parties shall file a joint preliminary pretrial conference statement by 9/25/2009. Signed by Judge James Ware on 9/9/2009. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/10/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Longino Acero, Jr., v. Plaintiff, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION NO. C 07-00029 JW ORDER CONTINUING PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL CONFERENCE United United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 County of Santa Clara, et al., Defendants. / On September 14, 2009, the parties are scheduled to appear for a Preliminary Pretrial Conference. The parties submitted a Joint Statement in advance of the scheduled conference. (Docket Item No. 86.) In light of the representations in the Joint Statement, the Court finds good cause to continue the Preliminary Pretrial Conference to facilitate a negotiated resolution by the parties. Accordingly, the Court continues the September 14, 2009 Preliminary Pretrial Conference to October 5, 2009 at 11 a.m. On or before September 25, 2009, the parties shall file a Joint Preliminary Pretrial Statement. Dated: September 9, 2009 JAMES WARE United States District Judge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT COPIES OF THIS ORDER HAVE BEEN DELIVERED TO: Marcy Berkman marcy.berkman@cco.sccgov.org Mark F. Bernal mark.bernal@cco.sccgov.org Michael Millen MikeMillen@aol.com Dated: September 9, 2009 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk By: /s/ JW Chambers Elizabeth Garcia Courtroom Deputy United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?