Kaltwasser v. Cingular Wireless, LLC

Filing 156

ORDER BY JUDGE JEREMY FOGEL 155 GRANTING DEFENDANTS' REQUEST FOR PERMISSION TO CITE JUNE 21, 2010 ORDER. (jflc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/30/2010)

Download PDF
Kaltwasser v. AT&T Mobility Doc. 156 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 MCKENNA LONG & A L D R I D G E LLP A T T O R N E Y S AT LAW **E-filed 6/30/2010** Felicia Y. Feng (184346) MCKENNA LONG & ALDRIDGE LLP 101 California Street 41st Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 267-4000 Facsimile: (415) 267-4198 Email: ffeng@mckennalong.com David L. Balser (pro hac vice) Nathan L. Garroway (pro hac vice) Jeffrey R. Baxter (pro hac vice) MCKENNA LONG & ALDRIDGE LLP 303 Peachtree Street, N.E., Suite 5300 At lanta, GA 30308 Telephone: (404) 527-4000 Facsimile: (404) 527-4198 Email: dbalser@mckennalo ng.com ngarroway@mckennalo ng.co m jbaxter@mckennalo ng.co m Attorneys for Defendant AT&T MOBILITY LLC f/k/a as CINGULAR WIRELESS LLC UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION JONATHAN C. KALTWASSER, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaint iff, v. AT&T MOBILITY LLC formerly known as CINGULAR WIRELESS LLC, Defendant. CASE NO. 5:07-CV-00411-JF ORDER Judge: Honorable Jeremy Fogel ORDER REGARDING REQUEST FOR PERMISSION TO CITE JUNE 21, 2010 ORDER 5:07-CV-00411-JF Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 MCKENNA LONG & A L D R I D G E LLP A T T O R N E Y S AT LAW S A N FRANCISCO FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, and notwithstanding footnote 1 of this Court's June 21, 2010 Order [Doc. No. 154], that Order is citable in McArdle v. AT&T Mobility LLC, No. CV-0901117 CW (MEJ) (N.D. Cal.) and in other cases. Dated: 6/30/2010 _____________________________ JEREMY FOGEL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE ORDER REGARDING REQUEST FOR PERMISSION TO CITE JUNE 21, 2010 ORDER 5:07-CV-00411-JF

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?