Shloss v. Joyce

Filing 45

Download PDF
Shloss v. Joyce Doc. 45 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 M A N A T T , PHELPS & P H I L L I P S , LLP A T T O R N E Y S AT L A W LO S A N G E L E S MANATT, PHELPS & PHILLIPS, LLP BRAD W. SEILING (Bar No. CA 143515) JOANNA S. MCCALLUM (Bar No. CA 187093) 11355 West Olympic Boulevard Los Angeles, CA 90064 Telephone: (310) 312-4000 Facsimile: (310) 312-4224 Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim-Defendant GOLDMAN, SACHS & CO. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA GOLDMAN, SACHS & CO., a New York Limited Partnership, Plaintiff, v. INNOVATIVE INTERFACES, INC., a California corporation, Defendants. INNOVATIVE INTERFACES, INC., a California corporation, Counterclaimant, v. GOLDMAN, SACHS & CO., a New York Limited Partnership, Counterclaim-Defendant. Case No. C 02 1863 CW (ARB) EXHIBIT "UU" TO SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION OF JOANNA MCCALLUM IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'S REPLY MEMORANDUM RE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 40663638.1 NOTICE RE EXHIBIT ATTACHMENT Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 M A N A T T , PHELPS & P H I L L I P S , LLP A T T O R N E Y S AT L A W LO S A N G E L E S NOTICE REGARDING EXHIBIT ATTACHMENT Exhibit "UU" is a true and correct copy of Goldman Sachs Exhibit "UU" to the Supplemental Declaration of Joanna McCallum in support of Goldman Sachs Reply Memorandum re its Motion For Summary Judgment and/or Partial Summary Judgment on First Amended Complaint and Counterclaims and will be maintained in the case file in the Clerk's office. Reason for manual filing: Document is filed under seal pursuant to stipulation and court order. Dated: September 5, 2003 MANATT, PHELPS & PHILLIPS, LLP By: /s/ Joanna McCallum Joanna McCallum Attorneys for Plaintiff Goldman, Sachs & Co. 40663638.1 2 NOTICE RE EXHIBIT ATTACHMENT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?