Enwere v. Terman Apartments, LP et al

Filing 145

ORDER re 142 Defendants' Request for Clarification and Assistance in Scheduling. Signed by Judge Patricia V. Trumbull on 2/12/09. (pvtlc1) (Filed on 2/12/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CATHY ENWERE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) TERMAN ASSOCIATES, L.P., dba ) TERMAN APARTMENTS, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ___________________________________ ) Case No.: C 07-1239 JF (PVT) ORDER RE DEFENDANTS' REQUEST FOR CLA R IFIC A TIO N AND ASSISTANCE IN SC H E D U L I N G UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION On December 4, 2009, this court issued an order compelling Plaintiff to produce her mental health records and requiring her to appear for a Rule 35 examination. On January 7, 2009, this court issued an order compelling San Mateo County Health Department to produce Plaintiff's mental health records. On January 9, 2009, District Judge Fogel granted a request by Plaintiff for time off from her lawsuit, and stayed this action until January 30, 2009. On January 14, 2009, Defendants filed a "Request for Clarification and Assistance in Scheduling," which this court denied because it violated the stay. On January 30, 2009, Plaintiff filed a document that included an objection to this court's orders compelling her mental health records and requiring her to appear for a Rule 35 examination. On February 2, 2009, Defendants filed a "Renewed Request for Clarification and Assistance in Scheduling." Plaintiff has not filed any response to Defendants' request. On February 9, 2009, Judge Fogel issued an order overruling Plaintiff's objections to this court's orders. Based OR D E R, page 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 on the file herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' request to reschedule the Rule 35 examination is GRANTED AS MODIFIED HEREIN. Defendants shall re-notice the examination for a date between February 24, 2009 and April 2, 2009. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' request that the February 24, 2009 hearing be advanced is DENIED. Defendants timely noticed Plaintiff's deposition, and thus the discovery cutoff will not preclude Defendants from deposing Plaintiff if their motion to compel is granted and any objection is ultimately overruled. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants shall contact the San Mateo County Health Department ("SMCHD") to arrange for compliance with the subpoena Defendants served on it. The court notes that SMCHD sent another copy of Plaintiff's records directly to the court. That was not what the subpoena requires SMCHD to do. Defendants shall promptly provide a copy of this order to SMCHD. Absent agreement of Defendants or further order of this court, SMCHD shall comply with the subpoena within 10 business days after Defendants provide it with a copy of this order. Dated: 2/12/09 PATRICIA V. TRUMBULL United States Magistrate Judge OR D E R, page 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 OR D E R, page 3 /s/ Donna Kirchner CORINNE LEW Courtroom Deputy for copies mailed on 2/12/09 to: Counsel automatically notified of this filing via the court's Electronic Case Filing system. Cathy Enwere 1263 Madera Ave. Menlo Park, CA 94025

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?